The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies in Classical Hebrew
Abstract
Professor Moshe Bar-Asher, Professor Emeritus at the Hebrew University and long-time president of the Academy of the Hebrew Language, has published more than 200 articles and sixteen books and edited aboout 90 books and collections. The vast majority of his work has been accessible, however, only to specialists who read modern Hebrew or French. Bar-Asher’s groundbreaking articles on the dialects of rabbinic literature are classics. In more recent years he has brought the same breadth and depth of grammatical knowledge, and philological acumen, to the study of older classical Hebrew texts, including literary and epigraphic texts. This volume presents studies of individual words and verses within the Bible, as well as broader thematic discussions of biblical language and its long reception-history, down through medieval scribes and modern lexicographers. Also represented are Bar-Asher’s penetrating studies of Qumran texts and languages, which illuminate both the linguistic traditions reflected in these texts and the scribal culture from which they emerged. The third section contains studies of Mishnaic Hebrew. There are both sweeping surveys of the field and its accomplishments and challenges, and studies of specific phonological, morphological, syntactic and lexical features.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A later date can be argued for in light of recent studies of Rabbinic Hebrew, which have found evidence in Palestinian epigraphy of some forms previously assumed to be 'Babylonian' isoglosses”
From The qameṣ (*/aː/ > [ɔː]) shift in Palestinian Hebrew: data, dating, and diffusion (2026) · cites this paper as Bar-Asher 2014: 256-7
In the citing paper
“A later date can be argued for in light of recent studies of Rabbinic Hebrew, which have found evidence in Palestinian epigraphy of some forms previously assumed to be 'Babylonian' isoglosses”
From The qameṣ (*/aː/ > [ɔː]) shift in Palestinian Hebrew: data, dating, and diffusion (2026) · cites this paper as Bar-Asher 2014: 241-2
In the citing paper
“raising the suggestion that 'Babylonian' forms in fact originated in Palestine but whose speakers (or: reciters) emigrated to Babylonia beginning in the third century.”
From The qameṣ (*/aː/ > [ɔː]) shift in Palestinian Hebrew: data, dating, and diffusion (2026) · cites this paper as Bar-Asher 2014
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The qameṣ (*/aː/ > [ɔː]) shift in Palestinian Hebrew: data, dating, and diffusion
Howard, J. (2026) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x25100992
Metadata
- Authors
- Bar-Asher, M.
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2014-01-17
- OpenAlex
- W2490226890
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Classical Hebrew, Hebrew philology, Biblical Hebrew, Hebrew Bible, Qumran texts, Mishnaic Hebrew, rabbinic literature, Hebrew dialects, manuscript culture, Hebrew lexicography, Hebrew grammar, Hebrew epigraphy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review