Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Studies and PhilologyAncient Egypt and Archaeology

Zur Priorität und Auslegungsgeschichte von Exodus 12,40 MT. Die chronologische Interpretation des Ägyptenaufenthalts in der judäischen, samaritanischen und alexandrinischen Exegese

·2015·Geschichte, Sprache und Text

Abstract

Zur Priorität und Auslegungsgeschichte von Exodus 12,40 MT. Die chronologische Interpretation des Ägyptenaufenthalts in der judäischen, samaritanischen und alexandrinischen Exegese was published in Geschichte, Sprache und Text on page 169.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110418293-012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Venue
Geschichte, Sprache und Text
Publisher
DE GRUYTER
Published
2015-06-26
Pages
169-176
OpenAlex
W2501872547
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
Hebrew Bible, Exodus from Egypt, Alexandrian exegesis, Jewish exegesis, textual priority, history of interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review