Black and Slave: The Origins and History of the Curse of Ham
Abstract
Studies of the Curse of Ham, the belief that the Bible consigned blacks to everlasting servitude, confuse and conflate two separate origins stories (etiologies), one of black skin and the other of black slavery. This work unravels the etiologies and shows how the Curse, an etiology of black slavery, evolved from an earlier etiology explaining the existence of dark-skinned people. We see when, where, why, and how an original mythic tale of black origins morphed into a story of the origins of black slavery, and how, in turn, the second then supplanted the first as an explanation for black skin. In the process we see how formulations of the Curse changed over time, depending on the historical and social contexts, reflecting and refashioning the way blackness and blacks were perceived. In particular, two significant developments are uncovered. First, a curse of slavery, originally said to affect various dark-skinned peoples, was eventually applied most commonly to black Africans. Second, blackness, originally incidental to the curse, in time became part of the curse itself. Dark skin now became an intentional marker of servitude, the visible sign of the blacks’ degradation, and in the process deprecating black skin itself.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the nineteenth century, the myth of Ham acquired its most notorious manifestation in antebellum America, where Ham was depicted as Black rather than Jew.
“However, this would change dramatically in the nineteenth century: the myth of Ham would acquire”
From Slavery, the Hebrew Bible and the Development of Racial Theories in the Nineteenth Century (2021) · cites this paper as Goldenberg 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slavery, the Hebrew Bible and the Development of Racial Theories in the Nineteenth Century
Burrell, K. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12090742 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goldenberg, D. M.
- Corresponding author
- Goldenberg, David M.
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- De Gruyter
- Published
- 2017-05-22
- OpenAlex
- W2783475104
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Theological Perspectives and Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Keywords
- curse of Ham, black skin, Black slavery, etiology, Blackness, biblical exegesis, skin color, Black Africans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review