Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TYPES OF LINGUISTIC COMMUNITIES

Gumperz, John J.·1968·Readings in the Sociology of Language

Abstract

Comparisons of linguistic and social behavior have been impeded by the fact that linguistic and anthropological studies are rarely based upon comparable sets of data. While the anthropologist's description refers to specific communities, the universe of linguistic analysis is a single language or dialect, a body of verbal signs abstracted from the totality of communicative behavior on the basis of certain structural or genetic similarities. To be sure, studies of individual languages vary greatly in range. They may deal with the speech of a small band of hunters and gatherers, a village dialect, or a literary language spoken by several hundred million speakers. But, on the whole, in selecting the data to be studied linguists give more weight to genetic relationships and structural homogeneity tharx to social environment. We think of English as a single whole, although a typical corpus may include texts stemming from rural England, urban United States, Australia or even former colonial areas of Asia or Africa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110805376.460

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Gumperz, J. J.
Venue
Readings in the Sociology of Language
Publisher
DE GRUYTER
Published
1968-12-31
Pages
460-472
OpenAlex
W2503129816
Cited by
244
References
0
FWCI
6.56
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TYPES OF LINGUISTIC COMMUNITIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9783110805376.460
The paper
Gumperz, J. J. (1968). TYPES OF LINGUISTIC COMMUNITIES. Readings in the Sociology of Language. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376.460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.