The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Subject and Power
Abstract
The ideas which I would like to discuss here represent neither a theory nor a methodology. I would like to say, first of all, what has been the goal of my work during the last twenty years. It has not been to analyze the phenomena of power, nor to elaborate the foundations of such an analysis. My objective, instead, has been to create a history of the different modes by which, in our culture, human beings are made subjects. My work has dealt with three modes of objectification which transform human beings into subjects. The first is the modes of inquiry which try to give themselves the status of sciences; for example, the objectivizing of the speaking subject in grammaire generale, philology, and linguistics. Or again, in this first mode, the objectivizing of the productive subject, the subject who labors, in the analysis of wealth and of economics. Or, a third example, the objectivizing of the sheer fact of being alive in natural history or biology. In the second part of my work, I have studied the objectivizing of the subject in what I shall call dividing practices. The subject is either
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Doing good?: The politics and antipolitics of NGO practices
Fisher, W. F. (1997) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.439 · Cited by 1,083
Emotions and Teacher Identity: A poststructural perspective
Zembylas, M. (2003) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540600309378 · Cited by 963
On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258718 · Cited by 836
The Politics of Space, Time and Substance: State Formation, Nationalism, and Ethnicity
Alonso, A. M. (1994) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.002115 · Cited by 659
Thompson, C. J., & Tambyah, S. K. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209560 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Foucault, M.
- Venue
- Ethische und politische Freiheit
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 1998-12-31
- Pages
- 387-404
- OpenAlex
- W2754121486
- Cited by
- 3,248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 259.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Subject and Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9783110815764.387
- The paper
- Foucault, M. (1998). The Subject and Power. Ethische und politische Freiheit. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110815764.387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.