The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis
Abstract
The making of models to encode knowledge is an intrinsic feature of human cognitive life. Signs, texts, codes, and various other representational forms are the direct outcomes of innate model-making systems. This book presents a methodological framework, developed from the field of biosemiotics, for studying semiotic phenomena as processes. It presents a descriptive system for uniting semiotics and biology so that the modeling instinct can be studied in terms of its manifestations in various species. The book is written in an accessible textbook style, and can thus be used as a manual by both professional semioticians and students taking courses in semiotics, biology, and the communication sciences. It is composed in such a way that a broad readership can appreciate the fascinating research going on in a relatively unknown area of interdisciplinary study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sebeok delineates three interconnected levels of modeling: primary (PMS), secondary (SMS), and tertiary (TMS), which correspond roughly to Peirce's categories of firstness, secondness, and thirdness [28].”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to the extensionality principle in MST, a virtual museum experience is often initially an iconic simulation (primary level) before it becomes indicative or symbolic (secondary or tertiary).”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Crucially, MST categorizes the artificial forms specific to human activity into four general types: singularized forms, composite forms, cohesive forms, and connective forms (see Table A1) [28,41].”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“MST's principles, such as the extensionality principle and the interconnectedness principle, highlight that higher-level (more abstract) modeling presupposes and builds upon lower-level modeling.”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to MST, once modeling is involved, even if grounded in iconic resemblance, the model inherently deviates from the original referent (hence Sebeok's point that every act of modeling introduces noniconicity).”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“As described in MST, the virtual museum operates as a complex modeling system.”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“First, the museum itself is a vast semiotic system, and virtual museums are no exception.”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Unlike language, which MST identifies as a secondary modeling system, the virtual museum here can be viewed as a tertiary system (cf.Sebeok and Danesi 2000, 83-85 [28]).”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecosemiotics: main principles and current developments
Maran, T., & Kull, K. (2014) · Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography · doi:10.1111/geob.12035 · Cited by 121
Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sense-making: Liminality of narrative processes
Picione, R. D. L., & Valsiner, J. (2017) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1136 · Cited by 106
Maran, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108942850 · Cited by 104
The Semiotic Hierarchy: Life, consciousness, signs and language
Zlatev, J. (2009) · Cognitive Semiotics · doi:10.1515/cogsem.2009.4.spring2009.169 · Cited by 75
Proactive screening for depression through metaphorical and automatic text analysis
Neuman, Y., Cohen, Y., Assaf, D., & Kedma, G. (2012) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2012.06.001 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M.
- ORCID
- Danesi, Marcel
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2000-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W612154768
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 65.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Umberto Eco and Semiotics
- Keywords
- biosemiotics, semiotics, meaning, signs, codes, representational forms, semiotic processes, animal communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review