The DOI matches its Crossref record.
2. Gradient and Visual Speaker Normalization in the Perception of Fricatives
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables
Niedzielski, N. (1999) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x99018001005 · Cited by 655
Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception
Strand, E. A. (1999) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x99018001006 · Cited by 388
Self-citationLanguage and discrimination: Generating meaning, perceiving identities, and discriminating outcomes
Craft, J. T., Wright, K. E., Weissler, R. E., & Queen, R. M. (2020) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011659 · Cited by 147
Dimension‐Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production
Lehet, M., & Holt, L. L. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12413 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Strand, E. A., & Johnson, K.
- Venue
- Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology
- Publisher
- De Gruyter
- Published
- 1996-12-31
- Pages
- 14-26
- OpenAlex
- W5739998
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2. Gradient and Visual Speaker Normalization in the Perception of Fricatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9783110821895-003
- The paper
- Strand, E. A., & Johnson, K. (1996). 2. Gradient and Visual Speaker Normalization in the Perception of Fricatives. Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821895-003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
