Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds
Abstract
This monograph provides a systematic treatment of topological quantum field theories (TQFT's) in three dimensions, inspired by the discovery of the Jones polynomial of knots, the Witten-Chern-Simons field theory, and the theory of quantum groups. The author, one of the leading experts in the subject, gives a rigorous and self-contained exposition of new fundamental algebraic and topological concepts that emerged in this theory. The book is divided into three parts. Part I presents a construction of 3-dimensional TQFT's and 2-dimensional modular functors from so-called modular categories. This gives new knot and 3-manifold invariants as well as linear representations of the mapping class groups of surfaces. In Part II the machinery of 6j-symbols is used to define state sum invariants of 3-manifolds. Their relation to the TQFT's constructed in Part I is established via the theory of shadows. Part III provides constructions of modular categories, based on quantum groups and Kauffman's skein modules. This book is accessible to graduate students in mathematics and physics with a knowledge of basic algebra and topology. It will be an indispensable source for everyone who wishes to enter the forefront of this rapidly growing and fascinating area at the borderline of mathematics and physics. Most of the results and techniques presented here appear in book form for the first time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The amplitudes of this spin-foam model are independent of the chosen cellular decomposition.
“The crucial property of this spin-foam model is that the amplitudes are independent of the chosen cellular decomposition [363, 206].”
From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [363]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity
Perez, A. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-3 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Barrett–Crane model from a Boulatov–Ooguri field theory over a homogeneous space
De Pietri, R., Freidel, L., Krasnov, K., & Rovelli, C. (2000) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00005-5 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Three-dimensional loop quantum gravity: physical scalar product and spin-foam models
Noui, K., & Perez, A. (2005) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/9/017 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe
Carlip, S. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-1 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Spin foam diagrammatics and topological invariance
Girelli, F., Oeckl, R., & Perez, A. (2002) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/305 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Turaev, V. G.
- Corresponding author
- Turaev, Vladimir G.
- ORCID
- Turaev, Vladimir G.
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- De Gruyter
- Published
- 1994-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4239903295
- Cited by
- 832
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
- Keywords
- topological field theory, 3-manifold invariants, knot invariants, Jones polynomial, quantum groups, modular categories, modular functors, mapping class group, 6j symbols, state-sum invariants, shadow, skein modules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review