Cited by 100Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentOvarian function and disorders

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in benign and malignant diseases

Hertlein, Linda, Stieber, Petra, Kirschenhofer, Angela, Fürst, Sophie, Mayr, Doris, Hofmann, Karin, Krocker, Katja, Nagel, Dorothea +2 more·2012·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

Background: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is described as a useful new biomarker in ovarian cancer. As HE4 is neither tumor nor organ specific, we intensively investigated the occurrence of this protein in female and male patients with various benign and malignant diseases in order to avoid misinterpretation and to identify potential additional clinical relevance. Methods: We retrospectively investigated HE4 (ARCHITECT ® , Abbott Diagnostics, US) in the sera of 205 healthy individuals, 654 patients with benign disorders and 720 patients with cancer before initial treatment. Results: The lowest concentrations of HE4 were observed in healthy men (median 26.2 pmol/L) followed by healthy women (median 40.4 pmol/L). In benign diseases, highest HE4 concentrations were seen in both women and men with renal failure (women, median 1041 pmol/L; men, median 1368 pmol/L). In women, the highest HE4 levels in malignant diseases were observed in ovarian cancer (median 242 pmol/l), whereas the highest HE4 concentrations in men occurred in lung cancer (median 89.2 pmol/L). The area under the curve (AUC) of HE4 in women was highest in ovarian cancer and borderline tumors as compared to benign gynecological disorders (88.9%), with a sensitivity of 67.4% at 95% specificity. Also, significantly elevated concentrations of HE4 with reference to the respective group of benign diseases were observed in uterus corpus and breast cancer as well as in lung cancer for men and women. Conclusions: HE4 has the highest relevance in ovarian cancer but can be elevated in a variety of benign and malignant diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2012-0097

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hertlein, L., Stieber, P., Kirschenhofer, A., Fürst, S., Mayr, D., Hofmann, K., Krocker, K., Nagel, D., Lenhard, M., & Burges, A.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Hertlein, Linda
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2012-07-24
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
2181-2188
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W1999217676
Cited by
100
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Abbott Diagnostics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
HE4, tumor markers, ovarian cancer, benign disease, renal failure, lung cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, borderline ovarian tumors, serum protein levels, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review