Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,020

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection

Open access
Lippi, Giuseppe, Plebani, Mario·2020·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview on the most frequent laboratory abnormalities encountered in patients with COVID-2019 infection An electronic search was performed in Medline (PubMed interface), Scopus and Web of Science, using the keywords 2019 novel coronavirus or 2019-nCoVor without date or language restrictions The title, abstract and full text (when available) of all articles identified according to these search criteria were scrutinized by the authors, and those describing significant laboratory abnormalities in patients with severe COVID-19 infection were finally selected The references of identified documents were also crosschecked for detecting additional studies A particular mention shall be made for procalcitonin and coagulation tests The former test does not appear substantially altered in patients with COVID-19 at admission, but the progressive increase of its value seemingly mirrors a worse prognosis This is not unexpected, whereby serum procalcitonin levels are typically normal in patients with viral infections (or viral sepsis), whilst its gradual increase probably mirrors bacterial superinfection, which may then contribute to drive the clinical course towards unfavorable progression The measurement of other innovative sepsis biomarkers, such as presepsin, for example, would probably help in increasing the accuracy in identification of severe COVID-19 cases, as well as for improving the current approach used for mortality risk prediction As concerns hemostasis tests, the evidence that laboratory criteria for diagnosing DIC are present in nearly three-fourths of patients who died underscores the critical role of these tests in this and other clinical settings, thus suggesting that their assessment shall be considered a routine part of COVID-19 patient monitoring

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2020-0198

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 1,020

Metadata

Authors
Lippi, G., & Plebani, M.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
1131-1134
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W3010026184
Cited by
1,020
References
19
FWCI
28.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/cclm-2020-0198
The paper
Lippi, G., & Plebani, M. (2020). Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0198

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.