Cited by 33Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBlood transfusion and management

To mix or not to mix venous blood samples collected in vacuum tubes?

Parenmark, Anna, Landberg, Eva·2011·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

There are recommendations to mix venous blood samples by inverting the tubes immediately after venipuncture. Though mixing allows efficient anticoagulation in plasma tubes and fast initiation of coagulation in serum tubes, the effect on laboratory analyses and risk of haemolysis has not been thoroughly evaluated. Venous blood samples were collected by venipuncture in vacuum tubes from 50 patients (10 or 20 patients in each group). Four types of tubes and 18 parameters used in routine clinical chemistry were evaluated. For each patient and tube, three types of mixing strategies were used: instant mixing, no mixing and 5 min of rest followed by mixing. Most analyses did not differ significantly in samples admitted to different mixing strategies. Plasma lactate dehydrogenase and haemolysis index showed a small but significant increase in samples omitted to instant mixing compared to samples without mixing. However, in one out of twenty non-mixed samples, activated partial thromboplastin time was seriously affected. These results indicate that mixing blood samples after venipuncture is not mandatory for all types of tubes. Instant mixing may introduce interference for those analyses susceptible to haemolysis. However, tubes with liquid-based citrate buffer for coagulation testing should be mixed to avoid clotting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm.2011.705

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have shown that failure to mix the primary blood tube most probably will not introduce a bias in many test results.

    “Some studies have shown that failure to mix the primary blood tube most probably will not introduce a bias in many test results.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parenmark, A., & Landberg, E.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Landberg, Eva
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2011-01-01
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
2061-3
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W2031780345
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
vacuum tubes, hemolysis, plasma tube, lactate dehydrogenase, activated partial thromboplastin time, coagulation tests, citrate buffer, clinical chemistry analytes
MeSH terms
Hemoglobins, Hemolysis, Humans, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Phlebotomy, Clinical Chemistry Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review