To mix or not to mix venous blood samples collected in vacuum tubes?
Abstract
There are recommendations to mix venous blood samples by inverting the tubes immediately after venipuncture. Though mixing allows efficient anticoagulation in plasma tubes and fast initiation of coagulation in serum tubes, the effect on laboratory analyses and risk of haemolysis has not been thoroughly evaluated. Venous blood samples were collected by venipuncture in vacuum tubes from 50 patients (10 or 20 patients in each group). Four types of tubes and 18 parameters used in routine clinical chemistry were evaluated. For each patient and tube, three types of mixing strategies were used: instant mixing, no mixing and 5 min of rest followed by mixing. Most analyses did not differ significantly in samples admitted to different mixing strategies. Plasma lactate dehydrogenase and haemolysis index showed a small but significant increase in samples omitted to instant mixing compared to samples without mixing. However, in one out of twenty non-mixed samples, activated partial thromboplastin time was seriously affected. These results indicate that mixing blood samples after venipuncture is not mandatory for all types of tubes. Instant mixing may introduce interference for those analyses susceptible to haemolysis. However, tubes with liquid-based citrate buffer for coagulation testing should be mixed to avoid clotting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies have shown that failure to mix the primary blood tube most probably will not introduce a bias in many test results.
“Some studies have shown that failure to mix the primary blood tube most probably will not introduce a bias in many test results.”
From Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling (2018) · cites this paper as [91]
Cites
Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing
Lippi, G., Luca Salvagno, G., Montagnana, M., Brocco, G., & Cesare Guidi, G. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm.2006.054 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling
Simundic, A.-M., Bölenius, K., Cadamuro, J., Church, S., Cornes, M. P., van Dongen-Lases, E. C., Eker, P., Erdeljanovic, T., Grankvist, K., Guimaraes, J. T., et al. (2018) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-0602 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Lima-Oliveira, G., Volanski, W., Lippi, G., Picheth, G., & Guidi, G. C. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/00365513.2017.1295317 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Lima-Oliveira, G., Lippi, G., Salvagno, G. L., Picheth, G., & Guidi, G. C. (2015) · Journal of Medical Biochemistry · doi:10.2478/jomb-2014-0043 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Could light meal jeopardize laboratory coagulation tests?
Lima-Oliveira, G., Salvagno, G. L., Lippi, G., Danese, E., Gelati, M., Montagnana, M., Picheth, G., & Guidi, G. C. (2014) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2014.036 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Lima-Oliveira, G., Lippi, G., Salvagno, G. L., Brocco, G., Gaino, S., Dima, F., Volaski, W., Rego, F. G., Picheth, G., & Guidi, G. C. (2014) · Biopreservation and Biobanking · doi:10.1089/bio.2013.0043 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parenmark, A., & Landberg, E.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Landberg, Eva
- ORCID
- Landberg, Eva
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2061-3
- ISSN
- 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4331
- OpenAlex
- W2031780345
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Keywords
- vacuum tubes, hemolysis, plasma tube, lactate dehydrogenase, activated partial thromboplastin time, coagulation tests, citrate buffer, clinical chemistry analytes
- MeSH terms
- Hemoglobins, Hemolysis, Humans, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Phlebotomy, Clinical Chemistry Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review