The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency and prototypicality
Open accessAbstract
We used free association and verbal fluency tasks to investigate verb-argument constructions (VACs) and the ways in which their processing is sensitive to statistical patterns of usage (verb type-token frequency distribution, VAC-verb contingency, verb-VAC semantic prototypicality). In experiment 1, 285 native speakers of English generated the first word that came to mind to fill the V slot in 40 sparse VAC frames such as `he ____ across the. . . .', `it ____ of the. . . .', etc. In experiment 2, 40 English speakers generated as many verbs that fit each frame as they could think of in a minute. For each VAC, we compared the results from the experiments with corpus analyses of verb selection preferences in 100 million words of usage and with the semantic network structure of the verbs in these VACs. For both experiments, multiple regression analyses predicting the frequencies of verb types generated for each VAC show independent contributions of (i) verb frequency in the VAC, (ii) VAC-verb contingency and (iii) verb prototypicality in terms of centrality within the VAC semantic network. VAC processing involves rich associations, tuned by verb type and token frequencies and their contingencies of usage, which interface syntax, lexis and semantics. We consider the implications for the mental representation of VACs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Reliability has been shown to influence language change (Bybee, 1985) as well as accuracy and error patterns in L1 (N. C. Ellis, O'Donnell, & Römer, 2014;Hay, 2001;Matthews & Theakston, 2006;Tatsumi et al., 2018) and L2 processing and acquisition (N.C. Ellis et al., 2014;Sugaya & Shirai, 2009).”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as N. C. Ellis, O'Donnell, & Römer, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This finding is consistent with findings reported in the previous literature on usage-based theories that have repeatedly demonstrated the facilitative role of contingency in language acquisition, processing, and use (e.g., N. C. Ellis et al., 2014;Matthews & Theakston, 2006).”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as N. C. Ellis et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,817
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought
VEREZA, S. C. (1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0239 · Cited by 9,849
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind
Odlin, T., & Lakoff, G. P. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982238 · Cited by 7,412
Finding community structure in very large networks
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.066111 · Cited by 7,390
Rescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,268
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
(1995) · Cited by 6,864
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315799438 · Cited by 6,761
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Ahrens, Kathleen. 1995. The Mental Representation of Verbs. Ph.D. thesis, University of California San Diego.
- Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617-645.
- Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In P. C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, 87-88. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Brazil, David. 1995. A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Christiansen, Morton & Nick Chater (eds.). 2001. Connectionist Psycholinguistics. Westport: Ablex.
- Danon, Leon, Albert Díaz-Guilera, Jordi Duch & Alex Arenas. 2005. Comparing community structure identification methods. Journal of Statistical Mechanics 29, P09008.
- Ellis, Nick C. in press. Implicit and explicit learning of language. In P. Rebuschat (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Language. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.
- Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning (eds.). 1996. Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. The COBUILD Series. London: Harper Collins.
- Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspective on 'alternations'. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9, 97-129.
- Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff. 2005. Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, 182-200.
- Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- MacWhinney, Brian. 1987. The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, 249-308. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- O'Donnell, Matthew B., Nick C. Ellis & Gin Corden. 2012. Exploring Semantics in Verb Argument Constructions using Community Identification Algorithms. Paper presented at the Language & Network Science Symposium: The International Conference on Network Science NETSCI 2012.
- Roediger, Henry, Kathleen McDermott & Kerry Robinson. 1998. The role of associative processes in producing false remembering. In M. A. Conway, S. Gathercole & C. Cornoldi (eds.), Theories of Memory II, 187-245. Hove: Psychological Press.
- Rosch, Eleanor, Francisco Varela & Evan Thompson. 1991. The Embodied Mind. Boston: M. I. T. Press. Brought to you by | University of Michigan Authenticated | 141.213.236.110 Download Date | 3/2/14 10:58 PM
- Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Trousdale, Graeme & Thomas Hoffmann (eds.). 2013. Oxford H andbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Vitevitch, Michael S. & Thomas Hills (eds.). in press. Insights to the Study of Language from Network Science. Special issue of Frontiers in Language Science.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar
Perek, F. (2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17 · Cited by 463
Statistical Measures for Usage‐Based Linguistics
Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12119 · Cited by 224
Self-citationKyle, K. D. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/8501051 · Cited by 229
Usage-Based Approaches to L2 Acquisition
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429503986-4 · Cited by 115
Self-citationRömer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12149 · Cited by 84
Self-citationABSOLUTE FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL ACQUISITION
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Kyle, K. D., & Monteiro, K. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263118000268 · Cited by 72
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives
Perek, F. (2015) · Cited by 69
Thinking About Multiword Constructions: Usage‐Based Approaches to Acquisition and Processing
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2017) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12256 · Cited by 66
Self-citationBi, P., & Jiang, J. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102248 · Cited by 65
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2014) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.4.4.01ell · Cited by 60
Self-citationEllis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118346136.ch7 · Cited by 57
Self-citationFrequency, contingency and online processing of multiword sequences: An eye-tracking study
Yi, W., Lu, S., & Ma, G. (2017) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658317708009 · Cited by 58
Second language learning of morphology
Ellis, N. C. (2022) · Journal of the European Second Language Association · doi:10.22599/jesla.85 · Cited by 43
Self-citationAdult Regularization of Inconsistent Input Depends on Pragmatic Factors
Perfors, A. (2016) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2015.1052449 · Cited by 43
Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014) · ICAME journal · doi:10.2478/icame-2014-0006 · Cited by 37
Self-citationChapter 2. Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Studies in corpus linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.73.03rom · Cited by 35
Self-citationDenhovska, N., Serratrice, L., & Payne, J. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12142 · Cited by 42
The Perception and Production of Arabic Lexical Stress by Learners of Arabic: A Usage-Based Account
Lin, C.-W. (2018) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 30
Monteiro, K., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. D. (2018) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amy056 · Cited by 28
Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12500 · Cited by 26
Self-citationRömer, U., Skalicky, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0055 · Cited by 24
Self-citationThe development of verb constructions in spoken learner English
Römer, U., & Garner, J. (2019) · International Journal of Learner Corpus Research · doi:10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom · Cited by 23
Self-citationOnline processing of Verb–Argument Constructions: lexical decision and meaningfulness
Ellis, N. C. (2016) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.18 · Cited by 22
Self-citationUsage-based approaches to language and language learning: an introduction to the special issue
Tyler, A., & Ortega, L. (2016) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.15 · Cited by 16
Second language lexis and the idiom principle
Vetchinnikova, S. (2014) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 15
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 13
Self-citationSemantic similarity to high-frequency verbs affects syntactic frame selection
Yi, E., Koenig, J.-P., & Roland, D. (2019) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2018-0029 · Cited by 13
Networks of meanings: Complementing collostructional analysis by cluster and network analyses
Dekalo, V., & Hampe, B. (2017) · Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association · doi:10.1515/gcla-2017-0011 · Cited by 12
A corpus-based exploration of constructions in written academic English as a lingua franca
Yılmaz, S., & Römer, U. (2020) · Studies in corpus linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.95.03yil · Cited by 10
Self-citationChen, A. C.-H. (2020) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt-2020-0012 · Cited by 10
Azazil, L. (2020) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2018-0139 · Cited by 11
Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703 · Cited by 9
Behrens, H., & Pfänder, S. (2022) · Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association · doi:10.1515/gcla-2022-0010 · Cited by 7
Römer, U. (2016) · Corpora · doi:10.3366/cor.2016.0087 · Cited by 5
Self-citationUsage-based analysis of L2 oral proficiency: Characteristics of argument structure construction use
Sung, H., & Kyle, K. D. (2025) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263125100995 · Cited by 4
Suethanapornkul, S., & Supasiraprapa, S. (2023) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263123000517 · Cited by 5
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000914000646 · Cited by 4
Self-citationPolišenská, K., Chiat, S., Szewczyk, J., & Twomey, K. E. (2020) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000920000306 · Cited by 4
Durational Patterns of Recurrent Multiword Combinations in Mandarin Spontaneous Speech Production
Chen, A. C. (2020) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830920966010 · Cited by 4
Modelling verb selection within argument structure constructions
Matusevych, Y., Alishahi, A., & Backus, A. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1200732 · Cited by 8
Ellis, N. C. (2026) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar.35.03ell · Cited by 4
Self-citationA Usage-Based Study of L2 Constructional Development: Combining Learner Corpus and Experimental Data
Jo, R., & Oh, S.-Y. (2021) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.76.1.202103.3 · Cited by 3
Basic Research Methods for Data Collection
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.004 · Cited by 3
On-line processing of verb-argument constructions
Ellis, N. C. (2016) · Review of Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1075/rcl.14.1.05ell · Cited by 3
Self-citationHwang, H., & Park, S. H. (2025) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716425100052 · Cited by 2
Matusevych, Y., Alishahi, A., & Backus, A. (2015) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 2
Kim, H., & Ro, E. (2026) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2025-0204 · Cited by 1
What is a Chinese word? Lexical constructionalization in Chinese
Zhang, L. (2024) · Folia Linguistica · doi:10.1515/flin-2024-2023 · Cited by 1
Domazetoska, I., & Zhao, H. (2025) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12710 · Cited by 2
Nesselhauf, N. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.008
When the linguistic L1 context is linguistic diversity – Norwegian language policy and education
Haugan, J. S. (2023) · Educational Role of Language Journal · doi:10.36534/erlj.2022.02.02 · Cited by 1
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.007 · Cited by 1
Introducing Linguistic Research
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316884485 · Cited by 8
Knowledge of Shàng (to go up) constructions in Chinese as a second language
Liang, H. (2015) · The University of Queensland · doi:10.14264/uql.2015.610
CHAPTER 10 Statistical Measures for Usage-Based Linguistics
Ellis, N. C. (2015)
Self-citationInfluence of Coerced Input on English Learners’ Grammar
Yoon, S. (2016) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Chapter 2. Usage-based perspectives on verb valency
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.02ch2
Chapter 6. Alternations as units of linguistic knowledge
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.06ch6
Chapter 7. The usage basis of alternation based productivity
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.07ch7
Chapter 3. Empirical evidence for usage-based valency
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.03ch3
Chapter 8. Summary and evaluation
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.08ch8
Chapter 4. The usage basis of constructional meaning
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.04ch4
Chapter 5. The importance of local generalizations
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.05ch5
The Development of Collocations as Constructions in L2 Writing
Garner, J. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/12009302
Give constructions in Korean EFL learner writing
Nam, Y. (2020) · Studies in corpus linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.95.02nam
Meaning-Shift Units in L2 Processing: Usage vs. Word Association Responses
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.006
Silaški, N. (2020) · Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/resla.19047.sil
From a Unit of Meaning to a Meaning-Shift Unit
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.002
L2 Use and Processing of Multi-Word Units
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.003
Usage Concgrams Compared to Exposure Corpus
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.009
Empirical Research in Linguistics
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.003 · Cited by 1
Meaning-Based Responses Are ‘Harder’ to Give
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.010
Language Documentation and Descriptive Linguistics
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.006 · Cited by 1
Insights from Linguistic Research
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.013
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.007 · Cited by 18
Meaning-Shift Units in L2 Learning and Use: Usage vs. Exposure
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.005
Sociolinguistics and Anthropological Linguistics
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.009
Cognitive Linguistics and Psycholinguistics
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.010
Introducing Linguistic Research: Preface
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.001
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.002
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.011
A Sample Word Association Task
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.008
Triangulating Usage, Exposure and Processing
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.004
Introducing Linguistic Research: References
(2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.014
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.001
Linguistic Research across the Discipline
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.012
Specific Research Approaches of Linguistic Subdisciplines
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.005
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.011
Vetchinnikova, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758703.012
Introducing Linguistic Research: Index
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021) · Introducing Linguistic Research · doi:10.1017/9781316884485.015
Shen, Y. (2024) · IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies · doi:10.21013/jems.v20.n1.p1
Rummel, M. (2024) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111315379-019
Dong, N. M. T., & Nguyen, B. T. T. (2024) · Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.56040/ndbn2113
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.13si
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.toc
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.refs
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.prelim
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.12ni
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.11ci
(2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17.01ch1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, N. C., O'Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- 2University of Michigan, Communication Neuroscience Lab, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Nick C.
- Venue
- Cognitive Linguistics
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2014-02-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-98
- ISSN
- 0936-5907 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3641
- OpenAlex
- W2034072710
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 98.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Cognitive Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Victoria University of Wellington
- Victoria University
- Bangor University
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- verb processing, verb frequency, semantic networks, free association, verbal fluency, usage statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
