Mediated memory making: The virtual family photograph album
Abstract
Domestic photography and the family photograph album hold significance as artefacts “communicating an ideal familial image and reifying the familial bonds, and also preserving a memory of a specific time” (Sarvas and Frohlich, 2011, p. 148). However, today’s practice of domestic photography is generally relocated to social media (Sarvas and Frohlich, 2011). Photographs previously found in the family photograph album are now likely to be located on the screens of phones and tablets. Using a Domestication of Technology framework, this article discusses how families are using Facebook to create, curate, share and archive family memories. It shows how families go through the phases of appropriation, incorporation, objectification and conversion when they adopt Facebook as the family photograph album. The authors also explore ways in which virtual family photograph albums can result in parental tension around domestic tasks of sharing and archiving family memories online, along with the possible implications of creating a potentially embarrassing, unauthorized digital footprint for their children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many smartphones can automatically sort photos in folders based on location and date information, and social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat offer personalized year-end stories; Spotify presents listening trends; Reddit summarizes user activities using statistics at the end of the year.
“For instance, many smartphones can automatically sort one's photos in folders based on location and date information-and social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat offer their users personalized year-end stories containing the supposed highlights of last year (Malik, 2021b; see also Holloway & Green, 2017).In a similar vein, Spotify presents users music and podcast listening”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Holloway & Green, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holloway, D., & Green, L.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Holloway, Donell
- Venue
- Communications
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0341-2059 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4087
- OpenAlex
- W2744506610
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 41.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communications (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- domestic photography, Facebook, social media, family memory, digital archiving, domestication of technology, mediated memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review