The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca
Open accessAbstract
In the relatively few years since empirical research into English as a Lingua Franca began being conducted more widely, the field has developed and expanded remarkably, and in myriad ways. In particular, researchers have explored ELF from the perspective of a range of linguistic levels and in an ever-increasing number of sociolinguistic contexts, as well as its synergies with the field of Intercultural Communication and its meaning for the fields of Second Language Acquisition and English as a Foreign Language. The original orientation to ELF communication focused heavily, if not exclusively, on form. In light of increasing empirical evidence, this gave way some years later to an understanding that it is the processes underlying these forms that are paramount, and hence to a focus on ELF users and ELF as social practice. It is argued in this article, however, that ELF is in need of further retheorisation in respect of its essentially multilingual nature: a nature that has always been present in ELF theory and empirical work, but which, I believe, has not so far been sufficiently foregrounded. This article therefore attempts to redress the balance by taking ELF theorisation a small step further in its evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014) · doi:10.1057/9781137385765 · Cited by 3,831
The Sociolinguistics of Globalization
Blommaert, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511845307 · Cited by 3,737
Mateus, S. G. (2014) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2014.965361 · Cited by 1,464
Cited by
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4404380 · Cited by 425
Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques
Sun, Z., Anbarasan, M., & Praveen Kumar, D. (2021) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/coin.12351 · Cited by 409
Teaching English through pedagogical translanguaging
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2020) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/weng.12462 · Cited by 335
Second Language Acquisition, world Englishes, and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF)
Mauranen, A. (2018) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/weng.12306 · Cited by 112
Lee, S., Jeon, J., & Choe, H. (2025) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3300 · Cited by 59
“There's a sniper on that hill!”: gaming in English as a global language environment
Peake, J., & Reynolds, A. (2020) · Angles · doi:10.4000/angles.3237 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenkins, J.
- Venue
- Englishes in Practice
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2015-08-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 49-85
- ISSN
- 2049-7156 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2237775352
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 270.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.