Cited by 12Wood Treatment and PropertiesStructural Engineering and Materials AnalysisUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

Influence of length on acoustic time-of-flight (ToF) measurement in built-in structures of Norway spruce timber

Arriaga, Francisco, Montón, Joaquín, Bobadilla, Ignacio, Llana, Daniel F.·2019·Holzforschung

Abstract

Time-of-flight (ToF) measurements were conducted on twelve 76×226-mm2 in cross-section, 4.52-m long specimens of Norway spruce timber pieces from a dismantled 19th-century building in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Two commercially available acoustic devices were used: the USLab ultrasound device with conical 22 and 45 kHz sensors and the MicroSecond Timer (MST) stress wave device with spike sensors. ToF were obtained for the full-length (4.52 m) specimens in an end-to-end arrangement and for lengths of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 m on the same surface and on opposite surfaces. The differences between the velocities obtained from end-to-end and semi-direct measurements were less than 4.5%. Apparent velocity dependence on length was observed in short-distance measurements. This could be corrected by determining a time lag (tL) from a linear regression between the ToF and the distance. Estimation of the modulus of elasticity (MOE) from the dynamic MOE (MOEdyn) is acceptable (r2=0.45–0.69) depending on the measurement procedure, and the best results for in situ timber are obtained in edge surface velocity. Although modulus of rupture (MOR) estimation from MOEdyn improves slightly when knottiness is included, it has low predictive capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/hf-2018-0122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recovered timber of the same species as the present study, warp was also identified as the main parameter of rejection when grading recovered Norway spruce applying the same NFB standard.

    “In recovered timber of the same species of the present study warp was also identified as the main parameter of rejection [30] for grading of recovered Norway spruce applying the same NFB standard.”
  • Non-destructive testing techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures.

    “Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures [25 -32].”
  • In previous studies, inclusion of knottiness parameters (CKDR) in the model increased the models R2.

    “In previous studies, inclusion of knottiness parameters (CKDR) in the model increased the models R 2 [27,30]”
  • Our R2s (0.51-0.66) are similar to those reported by Arriaga et al. [30].

    “which is similar to our R 2 s (0.51 -0.66).”
  • Arriaga et al. [30] found R2 between 0.53 and 0.62 in recovered Norway spruce timber using the ultrasound device USLab with 45 and 22 kHz to estimate MOE from Edyn.

    “Arriaga et al. [30] using the ultrasound device USLab (Agricef, Campinas, Brazil) with two different frequencies (45 and 22 kHz) to estimate MOE from Edyn found R 2 be­ tween 0.53 and 0.62 in recovered Norway spruce timber”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arriaga, F., Montón, J., Bobadilla, I., & Llana, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • GICITED (Interdisciplinary Group on Building Science and Technology), Department of Architectural Technology , EPSEB (Barcelona School of Building Construction), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya , Barcelona , Spain
  • Timber Construction Research Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid , Madrid , Spain
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Arriaga, Francisco
Venue
Holzforschung
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
339-352
ISSN
  • 0018-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-434X
OpenAlex
W2896241860
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Holzforschung (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Keywords
time-of-flight measurement, sound velocity, length dependence, elastic modulus, flexural strength, stress wave measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review