Cited by 29Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Effectiveness of online versus live multi-family psychoeducation group therapy for children and adolescents with mood or anxiety disorders: a pilot study

Sapru, Iman, Khalid-Khan, Sarosh, Choi, Elaine, Alavi, Nazanin, Patel, Archana, Sutton, Chloe, Odejayi, Gbolahan, Calancie, Olivia G.·2018·International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health

Abstract

Objective: [1] To highlight the effectiveness of multi-family psychoeducation group therapy (MFPGT) in children with mood or anxiety disorders; [2] to measure change in knowledge and awareness of mood and anxiety disorders in families and children; and [3] to compare the relative effectiveness of online compared to live MFPGT. Method: Participants included families of children (12 years or younger) referred with a mood or anxiety disorder to the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Queen’s University (n=16) who were on a waitlist to see a psychiatrist. Change was measured through questionnaires for all parents before and after the program. Using SPSS v22, comparisons between the online (n=6) and live (n=10) groups were made using the Mann-Whitney U test and within group comparisons were made using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The online and live education groups showed similar overall improvements in knowledge acquisition and expressed emotion in participating families. However, statistical significance must be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. Conclusions: Online MFPGT may be an effective way to increase knowledge, provide resources and support and build on skills thus giving individuals more control and confidence when dealing with a mood or anxiety disorder while on a waitlist. MFPGT showed equal efficacy in live and online groups, indicating that the online program has the potential to be a more convenient and accessible program for families. More research is needed with a greater sample size.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/ijamh-2016-0069

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sapru, I., Khalid-Khan, S., Choi, E., Alavi, N., Patel, A., Sutton, C., Odejayi, G., & Calancie, O. G.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Hotel Dieu Hospital (Queen’s University) , 166 Brock St. , Kingston , ON K7L 2Y6, Canada , Phone: +(613) 544 3400 ext. 2508, Fax: +613 544 7623
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Kingston General Hospital (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health
Published
2016-10-14
Volume
30
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0334-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0278
OpenAlex
W2561842985
Cited by
29
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
children and adolescents, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, family knowledge, expressed emotion, waiting lists, parent education, telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review