Cited by 66Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovations in Medical EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Interactive Learning Research: Application of Cognitive Load Theory to Nursing Education

Hessler, Karen L., Henderson, Ann M.·2013·International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of interactive self-paced computerized case study compared to traditional hand-written paper case study on the outcomes of student knowledge, attitude, and retention of the content delivered. Cognitive load theory (CLT) provided the theoretical framework for the study. A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design with random group assignment was used to measure by self-report survey student cognitive load and interactivity level of the intervention. Student scores on quizzes in semester 1 and post-test follow-up quizzes in semester 3 were assessed for the intervention’s effects on knowledge retention. While no significant statistical differences were found between groups, the students in the interactive case study group rated their case study as more fun and interactive. These students also scored consistently higher on the post-test quiz items in their third semester, showing the viability of using CLT to improve student retention of nursing curricula information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0029

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hessler, K. L., & Henderson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Northern Colorado (US)
  • Poudre Valley Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hessler, Karen L.
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
Published
2013-06-25
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
133-141
ISSN
  • 1548-923X (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5772
OpenAlex
W2080577481
Cited by
66
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
cognitive load theory, interactive learning, nursing students, knowledge retention, student attitudes, interactivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Nursing, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Professional Competence, Nursing Education Research, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review