Language and gender: Mainstreaming and the persistence of patriarchy
Open accessAbstract
Issues related to gender (and sexuality), largely ignored in the early development of sociolinguistics, have emerged as a cornerstone of the field. Spurred on by the feminist movement and new generations of engaged scholars addressing how language use both reveals and embeds gender inequalities, scholarship on such questions is now “mainstream” across a range of disciplines. Deborah Cameron argues that the primary focus in recent decades on social identity and performance, while path-breaking in many ways, has had the unintended consequence of drawing attention away from core issues of power and patriarchy in terms of gender relations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite feminist advances, patriarchy and the linguistic mediation of sexism remain relentless, carrying ever-evolving discourses of misogyny, homophobia and transphobia.
“patriarchy and the linguistic mediation of sexism remain relentless”
From Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research (2021) · cites this paper as Cameron 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean
Wodak, R. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781446270073 · Cited by 1,925 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hardaker, Claire & Mark McGlashan. 2016. Real men don't hate women': Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics 91. 80-93.
- McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2011. Gender, sexuality and meaning: Linguistic practice and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Phillips, Susan U. 2003. The power of gender ideologies in discourse. In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 252-276. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.
- Spender, Dale. 1980. Man made language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Thorne, Barrie & Nancy Henley (eds.). 1975. Language and sex: Difference and dominance.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relocating power: the feminist potency of language, gender and sexuality research
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021) · Gender and Language · doi:10.1558/genl.19523 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cameron, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cameron, Deborah
- ORCID
- Cameron, Deborah
- Venue
- International Journal of the Sociology of Language
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 2020
- Issue
- 263
- Pages
- 25-30
- ISSN
- 0165-2516 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3668
- OpenAlex
- W3030936467
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of the Sociology of Language (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- gender, patriarchy, gender and language, power relations, gender inequality, feminist linguistics, social identity, sexuality, sociolinguistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review