l maintained a strong belief in my language and culture: a Navajo language autobiography
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rough Rock educators sought to blend the old with the new-to construct discourses and practices that would prepare students to function in two languages and two worlds.
“Rough Rock educators sought to blend the old with the new—to construct discourses and practices that, in the words of the bilingual program director, would “prepare students to function in two languages and two worlds””
From When Tribal Sovereignty Challenges Democracy: American Indian Education and the Democratic Ideal (2002) · cites this paper as Dick, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Tribal Sovereignty Challenges Democracy: American Indian Education and the Democratic Ideal
Lomawaima, K. T., & McCarty, T. L. (2002) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312039002279 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
- Authors
- SELLS DICK, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of the Sociology of Language
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0165-2516 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3668
- OpenAlex
- W2139097592
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of the Sociology of Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Keywords
- Navajo language, language maintenance, language and culture, Native American languages, language attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
