Cited by 37Scientific Computing and Data ManagementGene Regulatory Network AnalysisResearch Data Management Practices

Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML) Level 1 Version 3 (L1V3)

Open access
Bergmann, Frank T., Cooper, Jonathan, König, Matthias, Moraru, Ion, Nickerson, David, Le Novère, Nicolas, Olivier, Brett G., Sahle, Sven +2 more·2018·Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics

Abstract

The creation of computational simulation experiments to inform modern biological research poses challenges to reproduce, annotate, archive, and share such experiments. Efforts such as SBML or CellML standardize the formal representation of computational models in various areas of biology. The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML) describes what procedures the models are subjected to, and the details of those procedures. These standards, together with further COMBINE standards, describe models sufficiently well for the reproduction of simulation studies among users and software tools. The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML) is an XML-based format that encodes, for a given simulation experiment, (i) which models to use; (ii) which modifications to apply to models before simulation; (iii) which simulation procedures to run on each model; (iv) how to post-process the data; and (v) how these results should be plotted and reported. SED-ML Level 1 Version 1 (L1V1) implemented support for the encoding of basic time course simulations. SED-ML L1V2 added support for more complex types of simulations, specifically repeated tasks and chained simulation procedures. SED-ML L1V3 extends L1V2 by means to describe which datasets and subsets thereof to use within a simulation experiment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jib-2017-0086

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. K. Choi, J. K. Medley, C. Cannistra, M. König, L. Smith, K. Stocking, and H. M. Sauro. Tellurium: A python based modeling and reproducibility platform for systems biology. bioRxiv, 2016.
  2. N. Goddard, M. Hucka, F. Howell, H. Cornelis, K. Skankar, and D. Beeman. Towards NeuroML: Model Description Methods for Collaborative Modeling in Neuroscience. Phil. Trans. Royal Society series B, 356:1209-1228, 2001.
  3. A. Hoffmann, A. Levchenko, M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore. The IκB-NF-κB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. Science, 298(5596):1241-1245, 2002.
  4. D. Waltemath, R. Adams, F. T. Bergmann, M. Hucka, F. Kolpakov, A. K. Miller, I. I. Moraru, D. Nickerson, S. Sahle, J. L. Snoep, and N. Le Novère. Reproducible computational biology ex- periments with SED-ML: the simulation experiment description markup language. BMC systems biology, 5(1):198, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergmann, F. T., Cooper, J., König, M., Moraru, I., Nickerson, D., Le Novère, N., Olivier, B. G., Sahle, S., Smith, L., & Waltemath, D.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Babraham Institute Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Rostock (DE)
Corresponding author
König, Matthias
Venue
Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics
Published
2018-03-19
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
262-262
ISSN
  • 1432-4385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4516
OpenAlex
W2187364252
Cited by
37
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
SED-ML, computational model, model annotation, model reuse, model modification, simulation procedure, data post-processing, data subsets, reproducibility, SBML, CellML, XML markup
MeSH terms
Documentation, Models, Biological, Programming Languages, Information Storage and Retrieval, Guidelines as Topic, Internationality, Systems Biology, Biological Ontologies, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review