Cited by 21Sexual Differentiation and DisordersAdrenal Hormones and DisordersMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

The adjustment of 17-hydroxyprogesterone cut-off values for congenital adrenal hyperplasia neonatal screening by GSP according to gestational age and age at sampling

Jiang, Xiang, Tang, Fang, Feng, Yi, Li, Bei, Jia, Xuefang, Tang, Chengfang, Liu, Sichi, Huang, Yonglan·2019·Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Background Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) screening is facing great challenges because of a high false-positive rate and a low positive predictive value (PPV). We established and optimized 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) cut-off values for CAH neonatal screening using a genetic screening processor (GSP) according to gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW) and age at sampling. Methods The 17-OHP concentrations in dried blood spots were measured by time-resolved immunofluorescence and were grouped in terms of GA, BW and age at sampling for 48,592 newborns. The 99.5th percentile was used to set an initial cut-off value as a reference. Results Significant differences in 17-OHP concentrations were observed among newborns with different GAs and BWs. A significant difference was observed among different sampling age groups. Finally, we defined new multitier cut-off concentrations based on GA and age at sampling. Application of the new cut-off values resulted in a 30% reduction of the positive rate and a 40% increase of the PPV. Conclusions GA, BW and sampling age time influenced the concentrations of 17-OHP. The efficiency of congenital adrenal hyperplasia screening can be substantially improved by adjusting the multitier cut-off value according to GA and age at sampling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpem-2019-0140

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most laboratories use a series of birth weight-adjusted cut-offs, but actual gestational age, or both, might be preferable, because gestational age correlates much better with 17OHP levels.

    “Most laboratories use a series of birth weight-adjusted cut-offs (253,254) but actual gestational age, or both, might be preferable, because gestational age correlates much better with 17OHP levels (27,255).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, X., Tang, F., Feng, Y., Li, B., Jia, X., Tang, C., Liu, S., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Yonglan
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1253-1258
ISSN
  • 0334-018X (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0251
OpenAlex
W2979929761
Cited by
21
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
congenital adrenal hyperplasia, newborn screening, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, cut-off values, gestational age, birth weight, dried blood spots, positive predictive value, false positive rate
MeSH terms
Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital, Age Factors, Aged, False Positive Reactions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Neonatal Screening, 17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review