Cited by 14Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Cardiac output and blood flow volume redistribution during acute maternal hypoxia in fetal sheep

Tchirikov, Michael, Strohner, Miriam, Scholz, Alexander·2010·Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Acute hypoxia is one of the main causes of poor neonatal outcome. The aim of this study was the investigation of cardiac output (CO) and blood flow redistribution following induction of acute hypoxia in a fetal sheep model. METHOD: We investigated 10 fetal sheep between 108 and 130 days of gestation. Acute hypoxia was induced by reducing the O(2) saturation in the ventilated gas mixture of the maternal sheep to approximately 75%. The CO, placental fraction of CO, Doppler parameters in the ductus venosus (DV), umbilical artery (UA) and vein (UV) were measured. RESULTS: The fetal pO(2) decreased from 47.1 (7.19; 7.35) to 6.89 (6.78; 7.11) mm Hg [P=0.01, median, (95% CI)] during hypoxia. Fetal pH and BE were also significantly reduced. The DV/UV fraction increased from 15.3 (11.5; 19.8) to 51.1 (35.9; 62.1) (P=0.0001). The combined cardiac output [1228.1 (1024.3; 1686.4) vs. 987.8 (834, 1261) mL min(-1)], the placental fraction of the CO [31.5 (26; 42.1) vs. 26.9 (20.6; 29.3)%] and the right to left (R/L) heart ratio [1.76 (1.5; 2.2) vs. 1.3 (1.1; 1.6)] significantly decreased during hypoxia. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hypoxia significantly increases the proportion of the placental blood passing through the DV and reduces the placental fraction of CO and the R/L heart ratio. These findings could be used as early signs of acute fetal hypoxia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpm.2010.053

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short-term hypoxic challenge induces changes in umbilical blood flow, with increases or decreases in flow immediately after the onset of maternal hypoxia depending on its severity.

    “This short-term type of hypoxic challenge also induces changes in umbilical blood flow, with increases or decreases in flow immediately after the onset of maternal hypoxia depending on its severity (380, 524).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [524]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tchirikov, M., Strohner, M., & Scholz, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
387-92
ISSN
  • 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-3997
OpenAlex
W2014981125
Cited by
14
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Perinatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
fetal hypoxia, cardiac output, blood flow redistribution, placental blood flow, ductus venosus, umbilical artery, umbilical vein, fetal sheep, fetal oxygenation, fetal acidosis, neonatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Hypoxia, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Volume, Cardiac Output, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Fetal Hypoxia, Fetus, Hemodynamics, Placenta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Sheep, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review