Cited by 38Higher Education Research StudiesParental Involvement in EducationFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Exploring the Parental Role in First-Year Students’ Emotional Well-Being: Considerations by Gender

Open access
Sax, Linda J., Weintraub, Dayna S.·2014·Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice

Abstract

During a time of growing parental involvement in the lives of college-going students, this study examines how interactions with parents relate to students’ sense of emotional well-being and how this varies by gender. Using longitudinal data on first-year college students at one institution, the study reveals the importance of both quality and quantity of student-parent interactions, and describes how this varies by the gender of the student and the parent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jsarp-2014-0013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Abar, C. C., Abar, B., Turrisi, R., & Belden, C. (2013). Communication technology used among parents and their college teens: Implications for college health promotion and risk prevention programs. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 25(1), 61-76.
  2. Ainsworth, M. (1982). Attachment: Retrospect and prospect. In C. Parkes & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), The place of attach- ments in human behavior (pp. 3-30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2006). Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century, (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11381-001 · DOI
  4. Astin, A. W. (1993a). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment. Phoenix, AZ: Oryz Press.
  5. Carney-Hall, K. C. (2008). Understanding current trends in family involvement. In K. C. Carney-Hall (Ed.), Managing parent partnerships: Maximizing influence, minimizing interference, and focusing on student success (pp. 3-14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Chodorow, N. (1999). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender: With a new preface. Berke- ley, CA: University of California Press.
  7. Daniel, B., Evans, S., & Scott, B. (2001). Understanding family involvement in the college experience today. In B. V. Daniel & B. R. Scott (Eds.), Consumers, adversaries, and partners: Working with the families of undergraduates. New Directions for Student Services, no. 94 (pp. 3-13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Gutman, L. M., & Sameroff, A. J. (2004). Continuities in depression from adolescence to young adulthood: contrasting ecologi- cal influences. Development and Psychopathology, 16(4), 967-984.
  10. Harper, C. E., Sax, L. J., & Wolf, D. S. (2012). The role of parents in college students' sociopolitical awareness, academic, and social development. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(2), 137-156.
  11. Jenny, T. J. (2012). The power of peer relationships in shaping character: Peer relationships as a predictor of college student pro-social character development. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com
  12. Johnstone, D. B. (2005). Financing of higher education: Who should pay? In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 347-369). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
  13. Kenny, M., & Donaldson, G. A. (1991). Contributions of parental attachment and family structure to the social and psychological functioning of first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 479-486.
  14. Mattanah, J., Brand, B., & Hancock, G. (2004). Parental attachment, separation-individuation, and college student adjustment: A structural equation analysis of mediational effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 213-225.
  15. Parsons, E. M., & Betz, N. E. (2001). The relationship of participation in sports and physical activity to body objectification, instrumentality, and locus of control among young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(3), 209-222.
  16. Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Domingo, R. J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 149-175.
  17. Sarigiani, P. A., Trumbell, J. M., & Camarena, P. M. (2013). Electronic communications technologies and the transition to college: Links to parent-child attachment and adjustment. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transi- tion, 25(1), 35-60.
  18. Sax, L. J., Bryant, A. N., & Gilmartin, S. K. (2004). A longitudinal investigation of emotional health among male and female first- year college students. Journal of the First-Year Experience, 16(2), 39-65.
  19. Sax, L. J., & Wartman, K. L. (2010). Studying the impact of parental involvement on college student development: A review and agenda for research. In John Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, XXV. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
  20. Tierney, W., & Auerbach, S. (2005). Toward developing an untapped resource: The role of families in college preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 29-48). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  21. Wolf, D. S., Sax, L. J., & Harper, C. E. (2009). Parental engagement and contact in the academic lives of college students. NASPA Journal, 46(2), 325-358. Brought to you by | University of California at Los Angeles Authenticated | dayna.weintraub@yahoo.com Download Date | 5/21/14 9:09 PM

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sax, L. J., & Weintraub, D. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sax, Linda J.
Venue
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice
Published
2014-04
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
113-127
ISSN
  • 0027-6014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-6591
  • 1949-6605
OpenAlex
W2054842109
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NASPA Journal (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
parental involvement, parent-student relationship, emotional well-being, first-year college students, gender differences, parent-child interaction, transition to college

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review