The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negotiation of face in web chats
Abstract
Using conversation analytic methodology, this paper investigates how ‘politeness’ and ‘face’ are negotiated in web chats. Following previous conversation analytic research (Heritage 1984), we first tie the concepts face and social solidarity to the conversation analytic concept of preference organization. We then proceed to describe the system of communication of chats, delineating some technological constraints of the medium that have an impact on the resources available for participants for indicating preferred and dispreferred turns. Specifically, we indicate that some resources available in ordinary talk-in-interaction are not available in web chats, while web chats also allow for certain resources not available in ordinary talk-in-interaction. By analyzing requests (i. e., first pair parts) and second assessments (i. e., second pair parts), we demonstrate how participants adapt their interaction to the specific environment of web chats when negotiating issues of social solidarity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the reviewer mitigated his comment (FF01M) with an emoticon (Golato & Taleghani-Nikazm, 2006), as illustrated in Figure 2.”
From 'Sorry, I don't good English': Japanese L2 students' written peer feedback in the face-to-face and anonymous review modes (2023) · cites this paper as Golato & Taleghani-Nikazm, 2006
Citations
Cites
Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5 · Cited by 891
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Thomas, 1992, Negotiation of face in web chats Holtgraves The linguistic realization of face management : Implica - tions for language production and comprehension person perception and cross - cultural communication Social, Psychology Quarterly, 55, 141
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, S. (2023) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.02 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Ohio State University.
- ORCID
- Golato, Andrea
- Venue
- mult
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-321
- ISSN
- 0167-8507 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3684
- OpenAlex
- W1969645655
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multilingua (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- face negotiation, politeness, online chat, online communication, social solidarity, preference organization, requests, turn-taking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negotiation of face in web chats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/multi.2006.017
- The paper
- Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Negotiation of face in web chats. mult. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi.2006.017