Cited by 22Bioenergy crop production and managementHeavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Preliminary results on growing second generation biofuel crop Miscanthus X giganteus at the polluted military site in Ukraine

Open access
Pidlisnyuk, Valentina, Trögl, Josef, Stefanovska, Tetyana, Shapoval, Pavlo, Erickson, Larry·2016·Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica

Abstract

Abstract The semi-field research on using second-generation biofuel crop Miscanthus x giganteus for restoration of former military site in Kamenetz-Podilsky, Ukraine was carried out during two vegetation seasons. Despite high metal pollution of soil, in particular, by Fe, Mn, Ti, and Zr, no growth inhibition was observed. The concentrations followed pattern soil > roots > stems > leaves. Accumulation of particular metals in roots was different: Fe, Mn and Ti were accumulated rather palpably after the first vegetation season and less tangible after the second one. Cu, Pb and Zn were less accumulative in both vegetation seasons, and for As and Pb the accumulative concentrations were very small. Accumulations in the aboveground parts of the plant in comparison to roots were significantly lower in case of Fe, Ti, Mn, Cu, Zn, Sr and even statistically comparable to zero in case of As, Pb and Zr. Calculated translocation ratio of metals in the plant’s parts preferably indicated lack of metals’ hyper accumulation. Generally, no correlations were observed between concentrations of metals in the soil and in the upper plant’s parts. The research confirmed the ability of Miscanthus x giganteus to grow on the military soils predominantly contaminated by metals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/nbec-2016-0008

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the contaminated soils, miscanthus root Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations were more elevated than in the rhizomes, stems and leaves.

    “In the contaminated soils, the miscanthus root Cd, Pb and Zn concentrations were more elevated than in the rhizomes, stems and leaves, in conformity with Nsanganwimana et al. (2015), Pidlisnyuk et al. (2016) and Kocoń and Jurga (2017) field experiments observations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pidlisnyuk, V., Trögl, J., Stefanovska, T., Shapoval, P., & Erickson, L.
Affiliations
  • Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem (CZ)
  • 2Department of Plant Protection, National University of Life and the Environmental Sciences, Herojiv Oboronu 13, 03040, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Venue
Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
77-84
ISSN
1338-6905 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2476900444
Cited by
22
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, military site remediation, soil metal pollution, heavy metal accumulation in plants, hyperaccumulation, phytoremediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review