Cited by 7Political Conflict and GovernanceDefense, Military, and Policy StudiesMilitary and Defense Studies

Impact of domestic and transboundary conflicts on militarization

Open access
Abbas, Hafiz Syed Mohsin, Xu, Xiaodong, Sun, Chunxia, Ullah, Saif, Raza, Muhammad Ahsan Ali·2020·Open Military Studies

Abstract

Abstract Security issues are the global concern nowadays, which triggers government spending on military equipment and supply chain. This paper analyzes the global perspective of cohesion indicators on Militarization by using 177 countries panel data from the Years 2011-2018 based on middle/lower and high-income groups. By applied OLS and Fixed Effect modelling, we explored the idea that Group Grievance and Population Growth Rate have a significant impact on Militarization in both income groups worldwide. However, middle/lower income group’s Militarization is more fragile than high-income groups due to state cohesion. It further analyses that Security Apparatus and Fractionalization Elite are significant in Middle/ lower-income countries and have an insignificant impact on Militarization in high-income countries. In the end, the study suggested that the United Nations must keenly observe the militarization trends of the less fragile states by considering global peace concerns and should play its role to resolve the bilateral conflicts in the region to maintain world peace environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/openms-2020-0102

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fragility index value has less robust results than an individual indicator as used in this study.

    “In panel data study observed that the fragility index value has less robust results than an individual indicator as used in this study [44,45,71].”

    From Do institutional governance and state fragility affect institutional quality in Asian economies? (2023) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Methodology describes a panel-data analysis using individual cohesion indicators, and Section 5.1.1 reports results for those indicators. Our copy does not compare their robustness with results from a fragility index (searched for the claimed comparison and for a composite-index comparison). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbas, H. S. M., Xu, X., Sun, C., Ullah, S., & Raza, M. A. A.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (PK)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Corresponding author
Abbas, Hafiz Syed Mohsin
Venue
Open Military Studies
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
24-35
ISSN
2545-3254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092405291
Cited by
7
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Open Military Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military and Defense Studies
Keywords
militarization, domestic conflict, population growth, state cohesion, security apparatus, income groups, fragile states, United Nations, world peace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review