Cited by 9Public Policy and Administration ResearchGlobal Security and Public HealthCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COVID-19 and Collective Action

Sandler, Todd·2020·Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

Abstract

This conceptual article argues that COVID-19 poses myriad global collective action challenges, some of which are easier than others to address. COVID-19 requires numerous distinct activities – e.g., vaccine development, uncovering treatment practices, imposing quarantines, and disease surveillance. The prognosis for effective collective action rests on the underlying aggregator technologies, which indicate how individual contributions determine the amount of a COVID-19 activity that is available for consumption. Best- and better-shot aggregators are more apt to promote desired outcomes than weakest- and weaker-link aggregators. The roles for public policy and important actors (e.g., multi-stakeholder partnerships) in fostering collective action are indicated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/peps-2020-0023

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Sandler, T.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Sandler, Todd
Venue
Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy
Published
2020-07-10
Volume
26
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1079-2457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8597
OpenAlex
W3042011963
Cited by
9
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, collective action, public goods, vaccine development, disease surveillance, quarantine, multi-stakeholder partnerships, public policy, pandemic response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review