Cited by 84Diverse Music Education InsightsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMusic Education and Analysis

Music education and its effect on intellectual abilities in children: A systematic review

Jaschke, Artur C., Eggermont, Laura H.P., Honing, Henkjan, Scherder, Erik J.A.·2013·Reviews in the Neurosciences

Abstract

Far transfer between music education and other cognitive skills, such as academic achievement, has been widely examined. However, the results of studies within similar cognitive domains are found to be inconclusive or contradictory. These differences can be traced back to the analytical methods used, differences in the forms of music education studied and differences in neural activation during the processing of these tasks. In order to gain a better picture of the relationships involved, a literature survey was performed in leading databases, such as PubMed/MedLine, psychINFO, ScienceDirect, Embase, ERIC, ASSIA and Jstor from January 2001 to January 2013. All studies included, concerned the far transfer from music education to other cognitive skills in children aged 4-13 years as compared with controls. These studies were independently selected and their quality was assessed by two authors. This systematic review shows the need to address methodological and analytical questions in greater detail. There is a general need to unify methods used in music education research. Furthermore, the hypothesis that intellectual skills, such as mathematics, reading, writing and intelligence can be divided into sub-functions, needs to be examined as one approach to the problems considered here. When this has been done, detailed analysis of cognitive transfer from music education to other disciplines should become possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaschke, A. C., Eggermont, L. H. P., Honing, H., & Scherder, E. J. A.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Jaschke, Artur C.
Venue
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
665-75
ISSN
  • 0334-1763 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0200
OpenAlex
W2128308617
Cited by
84
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews in the Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
Keywords
music education, far transfer, transfer of learning, intellectual ability, children, academic performance, mathematics, reading, writing, intelligence, neuronal activation, methodological issues
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Cognition, Humans, Intelligence, Music, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review