Cited by 1,223Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I).

Woodworth, R. S., Thorndike, E. L.·1901·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0074898

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task similarity has dominated transfer frameworks for more than a century.

    “Since Thorndike’s common elements theory was established in the 1900 s, task similarity has dominated transfer frameworks for more than a century, centering on similarity as a primary determinant of training transfer likelihood (Waris et al., 2015; Woodworth & Thorndike, 1901).”

    From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Woodworth & Thorndike, 1901

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodworth, R. S., & Thorndike, E. L.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1901-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
247-261
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W1993277309
Cited by
1,223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 60
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
psychological functioning, cognitive performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review