Memes, genes, and signs: Semiotics in the conceptual interface of evolutionary biology and memetics
Abstract
In 1976, Richard Dawkins coined the term meme as a way to metaphorically project bio-evolutionary principles upon the processes of cultural and social development. The works of Dawkins and of some other enthusiasts had contributed to a rise in popularity of the concept of memetics (“study of memes”), but the interest to this new field started to decline quite soon. The conceptual apparatus of memetics was based on a number of quasi-biological terms, but the emerging discipline failed to go beyond those initial metaphors. This article is an attempt to rebuild the toolkit of memetics with the help of the more fundamental concepts taken from semiotics and to propose a synthetic conceptual framework connecting genetics and memetics, in which semiotics is used as the transdisciplinary methodology for both disciplines. The concept of sign is used as the meta-lingual equivalent for both the concepts of gene and meme. In the most general understanding, sign is a thing which stands for another thing. In genetics, this translates into gene that is a section of DNA that stands for the algorithm of how a particular biomolecule is built. In memetics, the similar principle works in meme that is a thing that stands for the rules of how a particular cultural practice is performed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using Fomin's framework, 'woke' was the meme; AAE was the meme pool; the Movement for Black Lives was the memotype; and lifestyle magazines were the phemotype.
“Using Fomin's (2019) framework, I argue the vocabulary word,”
From The memeification of "woke culture": a multimodal critical discourse analysis of its articulation in Essence; O, The Oprah Magazine; and Teen Vogue (2023) · cites this paper as Fomin, 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Fomin, I.
- Affiliations
- National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Fomin, Ivan
- ORCID
- Fomin, Ivan
- Venue
- Semiotica
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2019-07-20
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 230
- Pages
- 327-340
- ISSN
- 0037-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3692
- OpenAlex
- W2903203130
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 25.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Semiotica (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- the Russian Science Foundation (17-18-01536)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- memetics, semiotics, memes, gene, signs, Richard Dawkins, cultural evolution, conceptual framework, transdisciplinary methodology, cultural practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review