Cited by 24Semiotics and Representation StudiesLanguage and cultural evolutionPhilosophy and History of Science

Memes, genes, and signs: Semiotics in the conceptual interface of evolutionary biology and memetics

Fomin, Ivan·2019·Semiotica

Abstract

In 1976, Richard Dawkins coined the term meme as a way to metaphorically project bio-evolutionary principles upon the processes of cultural and social development. The works of Dawkins and of some other enthusiasts had contributed to a rise in popularity of the concept of memetics (“study of memes”), but the interest to this new field started to decline quite soon. The conceptual apparatus of memetics was based on a number of quasi-biological terms, but the emerging discipline failed to go beyond those initial metaphors. This article is an attempt to rebuild the toolkit of memetics with the help of the more fundamental concepts taken from semiotics and to propose a synthetic conceptual framework connecting genetics and memetics, in which semiotics is used as the transdisciplinary methodology for both disciplines. The concept of sign is used as the meta-lingual equivalent for both the concepts of gene and meme. In the most general understanding, sign is a thing which stands for another thing. In genetics, this translates into gene that is a section of DNA that stands for the algorithm of how a particular biomolecule is built. In memetics, the similar principle works in meme that is a thing that stands for the rules of how a particular cultural practice is performed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/sem-2018-0016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 24

Authors
Fomin, I.
Affiliations
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Corresponding author
Fomin, Ivan
Venue
Semiotica
Published
2019-07-20
Volume
2019
Issue
230
Pages
327-340
ISSN
  • 0037-1998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-3692
OpenAlex
W2903203130
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
25.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Semiotica (publishedVersion)
Funders
the Russian Science Foundation (17-18-01536)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
memetics, semiotics, memes, gene, signs, Richard Dawkins, cultural evolution, conceptual framework, transdisciplinary methodology, cultural practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review