The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice
Abstract
This article examines the use of imagination as a communicative resource in interaction. Using actual examples of imagination in action collected during anthropological fieldwork at an architecture firm in California, I develop the concept of ‘collaborative imagining’ as a social, jointly-produced activity in which the objects of thought are created and manipulated in the shared space of face-to-face interaction. Such an activity relies upon a number of semiotic resources, and the paper examines three in particular: talk, gestures, and material objects, taking into consideration the talk and gestures of all participants in an interaction as well as the material surround available to the interactants. This view suggests two new ways to think about imagination. First, imagining is not a purely individual act but is also a product of and resource for group interaction; second, the objects of imaginative thought are not necessarily mental images, but can potentially be constructed in the material world with real, material components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
(1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.007 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Depicting as a method of communication.
Clark, H. H. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000026 · Cited by 365
The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction
Nevile, M. (2015) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499 · Cited by 272
The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology
(2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203492741 · Cited by 271
Optimal Grip on Affordances in Architectural Design Practices: An Ethnography
Rietveld, E., & Brouwers, A. A. (2017) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-016-9475-x · Cited by 77
Tracing architects' fragile knowing about users in the socio-material environment of design practice
Van der Linden, V., Dong, H., & Heylighen, A. (2019) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.004 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, K. M.
- Venue
- Semiotica
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005-01-30
- Volume
- 2005
- Issue
- 156
- ISSN
- 0037-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3692
- OpenAlex
- W2004638240
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 26.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.113
- The paper
- Murphy, K. M. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.