Cited by 160Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Explanation in Second Generation Expert Systems

Swartout, William R., Moore, Johanna D.·1993·Second Generation Expert Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_24

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swartout, W. R., & Moore, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Second Generation Expert Systems
Published
1993
Pages
543-585
OpenAlex
W1884349939
Cited by
160
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.53
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
second generation expert systems, explanation generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review