Cited by 48Food Safety and HygieneSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Safe meat-handling knowledge, attitudes and practices of private and government meat processing plants? workers: implications for future policy

Open access
Adesokan, Hezekiah K, Raji, A OQ·2014·Department of Health Science - University of Genoa

Abstract

Introduction. Food-borne disease outbreaks remain a major global health challenge and cross-contamination from raw meat due to poor handling is a major cause in developing countries. Adequate knowledge of meat handlers is important in limiting these outbreaks. This study evaluated and compared the safe meat-handling knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of private (PMPP) and government meat processing plants? (GMPP) workers in south-western Nigeria. Methods. This cross sectional study comprised 190 meat handlers (PMPP = 55; GMPP = 135). Data concerning their safe meat-handling knowledge, attitudes and practices as well as their socio-demographic characteristics, such as age, gender and work experience were collected. Results. A significant association was observed between the type of meat processing plants and their knowledge (p = 0.000), attitudes (p = 0.000) and practices (p = 0.000) of safe meat-handling. Meat handlers in the GMPP were respectively, about 17 times (OR = 0.060, 95%CI: 0.018-0.203), 57 times (OR = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.007-0.054) and 111 times (OR = 0.009, 95%CI: 0.001- 0.067) less likely to obtain good knowledge, attitude and practice level of safe meat-handling than those from PMPP. Further, KAP levels were significantly associated with age group, education and work experience (p inf. 0.05). Discussion. Study findings suggest the need for future policy in food industry in developing countries to accommodate increased involvement of private sector for improved food safety and quality delivery. Public health education on safe food handling and hygiene should be on the front burner among food handlers in general.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2014.55.1.419

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adesokan, H. K., & Raji, A. O.
Affiliations
University of Ibadan (NG)
Venue
Department of Health Science - University of Genoa
Publisher
Department of Health Science - University of Genoa
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
10-6
ISSN
1121-2233 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1501926441
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Università degli Studi di Genova
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
food handlers, knowledge, attitudes and practices, meat processing plant, food safety, food poisoning, cross-contamination, food hygiene, public health education, food safety policy, Southwest Nigeria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Food Handling, Foodborne Diseases, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Meat-Packing Industry, Middle Aged, Nigeria, Professional Competence, Private Sector, Public Sector, Nutrition Policy, Young Adult, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review