The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Squalene: potential chemopreventive agent
Abstract
Squalene is a triterpene that is an intermediate of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway and it can be obtained from the diet. Olive oil contains 0.2-0.7% squalene. The average intake of squalene is 30 mg/day in the United States, however, when consumption of olive oil is high, the intake of squalene can reach 200-400 mg/day as observed in Mediterranean countries. The decreased risk for various cancers associated with high olive oil consumption may be due to the presence of squalene. Experimental studies have shown that squalene can effectively inhibit chemically-induced colon, lung and skin tumourigenesis in rodents. The protective effect is observed when squalene is given before and/or during carcinogen treatment. The mechanisms involved for the chemopreventive activity of squalene may include inhibition of Ras farnesylation, modulation of carcinogen activation and anti-oxidative activities. However, several factors must be taken into consideration when the evidence for the inhibition of carcinogenesis by squalene is examined, these include the effective dose used and the time of exposure. The information obtained is from animal bioassays and the long-term effects from consuming increased levels of squalene are not known. Although animal studies have enhanced our understanding of the possible action of squalene in decreasing carcinogenesis, one must apply caution in extrapolating the information obtained in animal studies to humans, because of possible species differences. In order to evaluate the overall implications of squalene to human cancer prevention, further studies are needed to fully identify its protective effects, as well as possible detrimental effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of the mevalonate pathway
Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/343425a0 · Cited by 5,394
Strandberg, T., Tilvis, R., & Miettinen, T. (1990) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)42347-8 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Huang, Z.-R., Lin, Y.-K., & Fang, J.-Y. (2009) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules14010540 · Cited by 490
Microglia facilitate repair of demyelinated lesions via post-squalene sterol synthesis
Berghoff, S. A., Spieth, L., Sun, T., Hosang, L., Schlaphoff, L., Depp, C., Düking, T., Winchenbach, J., Neuber, J., Ewers, D., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00757-6 · Cited by 307
Gohil, N., Bhattacharjee, G., Khambhati, K., Braddick, D., & Singh, V. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00050 · Cited by 121
“Therefore, it proves to be calamitous, especially for the Ras hyperactivated tumor cells, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology | www.frontiersin.org 13 March 2019 | Volume 7 | Article 50 as well as the normal cells (Rao et al., 1998; Smith, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, T. J.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
- Publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1841-1848
- ISSN
- 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7658
- OpenAlex
- W2032536428
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Squalene: potential chemopreventive agent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/13543784.9.8.1841
- The paper
- Smith, T. J. (2000). Squalene: potential chemopreventive agent. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.9.8.1841
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.