The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Venoms as a platform for human drugs: translating toxins into therapeutics
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: An extraordinarily diverse range of animals have evolved venoms for predation, defence, or competitor deterrence. The major components of most venoms are peptides and proteins that are often protease-resistant due to their disulfide-rich architectures. Some of these toxins have become valuable as pharmacological tools and/or therapeutics due to their extremely high specificity and potency for particular molecular targets. There are currently six FDA-approved drugs derived from venom peptides or proteins. AREAS COVERED: This article surveys the current pipeline of venom-derived therapeutics and critically examines the potential of peptide and protein drugs derived from venoms. Emerging trends are identified, including an increasing industry focus on disulfide-rich venom peptides and the use of a broader array of molecular targets in order to develop venom-based therapeutics for treating a wider range of clinical conditions. EXPERT OPINION: Key technical advances in combination with a renewed industry-wide focus on biologics have converged to provide a larger than ever pipeline of venom-derived therapeutics. Disulfide-rich venom peptides obviate some of the traditional disadvantages of therapeutic peptides and some may be suitable for oral administration. Moreover, some venom peptides can breach the blood brain barrier and translocate across cell membranes, which opens up the possibility of exploiting molecular targets not previously accessible to peptide drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2007) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np068054v · Cited by 5,517
The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D
Pammolli, F., Magazzini, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3405 · Cited by 918
Fry, B. G. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3228405 · Cited by 486
Exenatide once weekly for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
Malone, J., Trautmann, M., Wilhelm, K., Taylor, K., & Kendall, D. M. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1517/13543780902766802 · Cited by 55
Cited by
Therapeutic Peptides: Current Applications and Future Directions
Wang, L., Wang, N., Zhang, W., Cheng, X., Yan, Z., Shao, G., Wang, X., Wang, R., & Fu, C. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4 · Cited by 2,131
Voltage-gated sodium channels: structure, function, pharmacology, and clinical indications
de Lera Ruiz, M., & Kraus, R. L. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm501981g · Cited by 548
Bordon, K. D. C. F., Cologna, C. T., Fornari-Baldo, E. C., Pinheiro-Júnior, E. L., Cerni, F. A., Amorim, F. G., Anjolette, F. A. P., Cordeiro, F. A., Wiezel, G. A., Cardoso, I. A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.01132 · Cited by 303
Ho, T. N. T., Abraham, N., & Lewis, R. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.609005 · Cited by 87
Toxin synergism in snake venoms
Laustsen, A. H. (2016) · Toxin Reviews · doi:10.1080/15569543.2016.1220397 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- King, G. F.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-09-23
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1469-1484
- ISSN
- 1471-2598 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2075127809
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Venoms as a platform for human drugs: translating toxins into therapeutics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/14712598.2011.621940
- The paper
- King, G. F. (2011). Venoms as a platform for human drugs: translating toxins into therapeutics. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2011.621940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.