Cited by 70Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

SGLT2 inhibition: efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes treatment

Scheen, André J.·2015·Expert Opinion on Drug Safety

Abstract

Introduction Inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporters type 2 (SGLT2) offer a new opportunity for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents reduce hyperglycemia by decreasing the renal glucose threshold and thereby increasing urinary glucose excretion. Subsequent reduction of glucotoxicity improves beta-cell sensitivity to glucose and tissue insulin sensitivity. Areas covered This article analyzes the efficacy and safety data of canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in randomized controlled trials of 24 - 104 weeks duration, compared with placebo or an active comparator, in patients treated with diet/exercise, metformin, dual oral therapy or insulin. Expert opinion SGLT2 inhibitors significantly and consistently reduce glycated hemoglobin, with a minimal risk of hypoglycemia. The improvement of glucose control is similar or slightly better compared with metformin, sulfonylureas or sitagliptin, with the add-on value of significant reductions in body weight and blood pressure. However, caution is recommended in fragile elderly patients and patients with chronic kidney disease. An increased risk of genital mycotic infections is observed, but urinary tract infections are rare. Concern about an unexpected risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis has been recently reported. A possible renal protection deserves further attention. A remarkable reduction in cardiovascular mortality was reported in EMPA-REG OUTCOME with empagliflozin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14740338.2015.1100167

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 124 · Cited by 70

Authors
Scheen, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Scheen, André J.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Published
2015-10-29
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
1879-1904
ISSN
  • 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-764X
OpenAlex
W2198388354
Cited by
70
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
SGLT2 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, weight loss, blood pressure reduction, genital mycotic infections, euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis, chronic kidney disease, renal protection, cardiovascular mortality, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, metformin comparison
MeSH terms
Canagliflozin, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Aged, Benzhydryl Compounds, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Glucosides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review