Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent advances in biomarkers and therapeutic interventions for hepatic drug safety – false dawn or new horizon?

Clarke, Joanna I., Dear, James W., Antoine, Daniel J.·2016·Expert Opinion on Drug Safety

Abstract

Introduction Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents a serious medical challenge and a potentially fatal adverse event. Currently, DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion, and whilst the electronic evaluation of serious drug-induced hepatotoxicity (eDISH) have revolutionised the early assessment of DILI, this model is dependent upon clinical chemistry parameters that lack sensitivity and specificity. DILI management usually consists of initial withdrawal of the suspected drug and, in the case of acetaminophen, administration of specific therapy. Areas covered We summarise recent advances and knowledge gaps in the development and qualification of novel DILI biomarkers and therapeutic interventions. Expert opinion Promising biomarkers have been identified that provide increased hepatic specificity (miR-122), mechanistic insight (Keratin-18), and prognostic information (HMGB1, KIM-1, CSF-1). Pharmacogenomics holds potential to preselect susceptible populations and tailor drug therapy. Biomarkers can uncover new mechanisms of drug-induced pathophysiology which, for HMGB1 and CSF-1, have led to promising mechanism-based therapeutic interventions. However, these biomarkers have not been formally qualified and are not in routine clinical use. With the development of inventive clinical trials and by maximising DILI data registries, these novel biomarkers could add substantial value to the current armoury, change the management of DILI in the near future and improve patient safety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14740338.2016.1160057

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. 10.1053/jhep.2002.34857 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s00228-004-0888-z · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01019.x · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF03261997 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.016 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/hep.23577 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1517/17425255.2012.693914 · DOI
  8. 10.1353/pbm.1968.0004 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/clpt.2012.108 · DOI
  10. 10.2165/11586600-000000000-00000 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s40264-014-0184-5 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s40264-014-0183-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s40264-014-0181-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.tox.2007.11.021 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/clpt.2012.40 · DOI
  16. 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nrd1745 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.04.011 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/00498250903046993 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nbt0510-436 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nbt.1623 · DOI
  22. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3283589a76 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706135 · DOI
  24. 10.2217/pgs.12.146 · DOI
  25. 10.1101/gr.090241.108 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/toxsci/kfs238 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/clpt.2012.101 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/med.20215 · DOI
  29. 10.1373/clinchem.2010.147850 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/bcp.12214 · DOI
  31. 10.1055/s-0034-1397348 · DOI
  32. 10.3109/1354750X.2012.657246 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nature00858 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1126/science.285.5425.248 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/emboj.2012.328 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature11290 · DOI
  37. Yang H, 2012, Mol Med, 18, 250, 10.2119/molmed.2011.00389 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.2119/molmed.2014.00022 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/emboj/cdg516 · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.1316925111 · DOI
  41. 10.2119/molmed.2010.00126 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/hep.26294 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.019 · DOI
  44. 10.1172/JCI76887 · DOI
  45. 10.1084/jem.20141318 · DOI
  46. 10.1074/jbc.M114.552141 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.taap.2013.09.023 · DOI
  48. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.053 · DOI
  49. 10.1053/jhep.2002.32532 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043809 · DOI
  51. 10.1681/ASN.2013070758 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/hep.27857 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/hep.21976 · DOI
  54. 10.1083/jcb.138.6.1379 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.02.019 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/hep.21223 · DOI
  57. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2136 · DOI
  58. 10.1172/JCI118864 · DOI
  59. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.007 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.029 · DOI
  61. Feldman BF, 1989, Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals, 835
  62. Stonard MD, 1996, Animal clinical chemistry, 87
  63. 10.1016/0009-8981(88)90356-7 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/toxsci/kft009 · DOI
  65. 10.1258/002367702320162414 · DOI
  66. 10.1172/JCI59755 · DOI
  67. 10.1186/2050-6511-15-42 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/toxsci/kft087 · DOI
  69. 10.1021/tx800464q · DOI
  70. 10.1007/s00204-013-1118-1 · DOI
  71. 10.1586/17512433.2014.880650 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1136/bmj.319.7224.1541 · DOI
  73. 10.2217/bmm.13.42 · DOI
  74. 10.1002/hep.22633 · DOI
  75. 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e141 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Clarke, J. I., Dear, J. W., & Antoine, D. J.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Published
2016-03-17
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
625-634
ISSN
  • 1474-0338
  • 1744-764X
Cited by
46
References
7
Language
en
Funders
Medical Research Council (ITTP PhD studentship)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review