The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasonic drug delivery – a general review
Open accessAbstract
Ultrasound has an ever-increasing role in the delivery of therapeutic agents, including genetic material, protein and chemotherapeutic agents. Cavitating gas bodies, such as microbubbles, are the mediators through which the energy of relatively non-interactive pressure waves is concentrated to produce forces that permeabilise cell membranes and disrupt the vesicles that carry drugs. Thus, the presence of microbubbles enormously enhances ultrasonic delivery of genetic material, proteins and smaller chemical agents. Numerous reports show that the most efficient delivery of genetic material occurs in the presence of cavitating microbubbles. Attaching the DNA directly to the microbubbles, or to gas-containing liposomes, enhances gene uptake even further. Ultrasonic-enhanced gene delivery has been studied in various tissues, including cardiac, vascular, skeletal muscle, tumour and even fetal tissue. Ultrasonic-assisted delivery of proteins has found most application in transdermal transport of insulin. Cavitation events reversibly disrupt the structure of the stratus corneum to allow transport of these large molecules. Other hormones and small proteins could also be delivered transdermally. Small chemotherapeutic molecules are delivered in research settings from micelles and liposomes exposed to ultrasound. Cavitation appears to play two roles: it disrupts the structure of the carrier vesicle and releases the drug; and makes cell membranes and capillaries more permeable to drugs. There remains a need to better understand the physics of cavitation of microbubbles and the impact that such cavitation has on cells and drug-carrying vesicles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Martin, H., Jolesz, F. A., & Vykhodtseva, N. (2003) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00741-x · Cited by 144
Ultrasound-enhanced tumor targeting of polymeric micellar drug carriers
Gao, Z., Fain, H. D., & Rapoport, N. (2004) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp049958h · Cited by 121
Mechanism of the ultrasonic activation of micellar drug delivery
Marin, A., Muniruzzaman, M., & Rapoport, N. (2001) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00363-7 · Cited by 102
Cho, C.-W., Liu, Y., Cobb, W. N., Henthorn, T. K., Lillehei, K., Christians, U., & Ng, K.-Y. (2002) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1019837923906 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Microscale acoustofluidics: Microfluidics driven via acoustics and ultrasonics
Friend, J., & Yeo, L. Y. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.647 · Cited by 964
Nano/Microscale Motors: Biomedical Opportunities and Challenges
Wang, J., & Gao, W. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn3028997 · Cited by 668
Izadifar, Z., Izadifar, Z., Chapman, D., & Babyn, P. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9020460 · Cited by 457
Lee, E. S., Oh, K. T., Kim, D., Youn, Y. S., & Bae, Y. H. (2007) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.08.006 · Cited by 446
Ngamwonglumlert, L., Devahastin, S., & Chiewchan, N. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2015.1109498 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitt, W. G., Husseini, G. A., & Staples, B. J.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
- Publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-56
- ISSN
- 1742-5247 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7593
- OpenAlex
- W1964069216
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasonic drug delivery – a general review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/17425247.1.1.37
- The paper
- Pitt, W. G., Husseini, G. A., & Staples, B. J. (2004). Ultrasonic drug delivery – a general review. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.1.1.37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.