Cited by 121Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Ultrasound-enhanced tumor targeting of polymeric micellar drug carriers

Open access
Gao, Zhonggao, Fain, Heidi D., Rapoport, Natalya·2004·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Cancer chemotherapy is often complicated by toxic side effects of anticancer drugs. We are developing a new modality of tumor chemotherapy aimed at circumventing side effects of treatment via drug targeting to tumors. The technique is based on drug encapsulation in polymeric micelles followed by a controlled drug release at a target site triggered by ultrasonic irradiation. The encouraging in vitro results of previous years warranted animal experiments for verification of the in vivo feasibility of the proposed technique. We report here on the effect of ultrasound on a biodistribution of a micellar drug carrier (fluorescently labeled Pluronic micelles) in ovarian cancer-bearing nu/nu mice. The degree of carrier accumulation in the cells of various organs was characterized by flow cytometry. Polymeric micelles were formed in either pure Pluronic P-105 solutions (unstabilized micelles) or 1:1 (weight) mixtures of Pluronic P-105 with PEG-diacylphospholipid (stabilized micelles). Intraperitoneal (ip) and intravenous (iv) injections were compared. The data showed that a 30 s ultrasonic irradiation by 1 or 3 MHz ultrasound applied locally to the tumor significantly enhanced accumulation of Pluronic in the tumor cells, which was observed for both ip and iv injections and for unstabilized and stabilized micelles. The data indicated targeting of Pluronic micelles to the tumors; the degree of targeting was enhanced by a local tumor sonication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/mp049958h

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results showed that locally applied irradiation of the tumor with 1-3 MHz ultrasound during 30 s resulted in considerable accumulation of both types of Pluronic nanomicelles after intraperitoneal and intravenous injections.

    “The results showed that locally applied to the irradiation of the tumor with 1–3 MHz ultrasound during 30 s resulted in considerable accumulation of both types of Pluronic nanomicelles after intraperitoneal and intravenous injections.”

    From Recent Advances in Nanomicelles Delivery Systems. (2020) · cites this paper as [208]

  • The selectivity of ultrasound-responsive Pluronic-based nanomicelles toward tumors cells was demonstrated.

    “Thus, the selectivity of ultrasound-responsive Pluronic-based nanomicelles toward tumors cells was demonstrated.”

    From Recent Advances in Nanomicelles Delivery Systems. (2020) · cites this paper as [208]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Rapoport N, Marin A, Christensen D. Ultrasound-Activated Micellar Drug Delivery. Drug Delivery Syst Sci. 2002;2:37–46. [Google Scholar]
  2. [19]Hermanson, G. T. Bioconjugate techniques; Academic Press: San Diego, 1996; pp 303–306.
  3. [26]Batrakova E, Alakhov V, Kabanov A. Selective energy depletion and sensitization of multiple drug resistant cancer cells by Pluronic block copolymer. Polym Prepr (Am Chem Soc, Div Polym Chem) 2000;41:1739–1740. [Google Scholar]
  4. [30]Yusuf S. Evaluation of RheothRx, a novel hemorheologic agent, in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1995;92(Suppl I):I–24 . (Abstract). [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, Z., Fain, H. D., & Rapoport, N.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Rapoport, Natalya
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2004-06-02
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
317-330
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W2087045033
Cited by
121
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01 EB1033, R01EB001033)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
ultrasound-triggered drug release, polymeric micelles, tumor targeting, tissue distribution, ovarian cancer, sonication, targeted drug delivery
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinoma, Drug Carriers, Feasibility Studies, Female, Flow Cytometry, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Mice, Nude, Micelles, Neoplasm Transplantation, Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymers, Ultrasonic Therapy, Drug Delivery Systems, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review