The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skin permeabilization for transdermal drug delivery: recent advances and future prospects
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Transdermal delivery has potential advantages over other routes of administration. It could reduce first-pass metabolism associated with oral delivery and is less painful than injections. However, the outermost layer of the skin, the stratum corneum (SC), limits passive diffusion to small lipophilic molecules. Therefore, methods are needed to safely permeabilize the SC so that ionic and larger molecules may be delivered transdermally. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on low-frequency sonophoresis, microneedles, electroporation and iontophoresis, and combinations of these methods to permeabilize the SC. The mechanisms of enhancements and developments in the last 5 years are discussed. Potentially high-impact applications, including protein delivery, vaccination and sensing are presented. Finally, commercial interest and clinical trials are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Not all permeabilization methods are appropriate for all applications. Focused studies into applications utilizing the advantages of each method are needed. The total dose and kinetics of delivery must be considered. Vaccination is one application where permeabilization methods could make an impact. Protein delivery and analyte sensing are also areas of potential impact, although the amount of material that can be delivered (or extracted) is of critical importance. Additional work on the miniaturization of these technologies will help to increase commercial interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glucose sensors: a review of current and emerging technology
Oliver, N. S., Toumazou, C., Cass, A. E. G., & Johnston, D. G. (2009) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02642.x · Cited by 584
Cited by
Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics
Anselmo, A. C., Gokarn, Y., & Mitragotri, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.183 · Cited by 665
Overcoming skin barriers through advanced transdermal drug delivery approaches
Phatale, V., Vaiphei, K. K., Jha, S., Patil, D., Agrawal, M., & Alexander, A. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.025 · Cited by 482
Carrageenan based hydrogels for drug delivery, tissue engineering and wound healing
Yegappan, R., Selvaprithiviraj, V., Amirthalingam, S., & Jayakumar, R. (2018) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.086 · Cited by 462
Permeation enhancers in transdermal drug delivery: benefits and limitations
Kováčik, A., Kopečná, M., & Vávrová, K. (2020) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2020.1713087 · Cited by 369
Polio vaccination: Past, present and future
Bandyopadhyay, A. S., Garon, J., Seib, K., & Orenstein, W. A. (2015) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.15.19 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoellhammer, C. M., Blankschtein, D., & Langer, R.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-407
- ISSN
- 1742-5247 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7593
- OpenAlex
- W1584685135
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin permeabilization for transdermal drug delivery: recent advances and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/17425247.2014.875528
- The paper
- Schoellhammer, C. M., Blankschtein, D., & Langer, R. (2014). Skin permeabilization for transdermal drug delivery: recent advances and future prospects. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.875528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.