The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These interest-holders were engaged throughout the development of this ScR through the use of an integrated knowledge translation approach [40,41].”
From Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“An integrated knowledge translation model, also known as research coproduction, involves interest-holders as equal contributors to the research process to produce results that are more likely to be relevant and useful to end users [40][41][42][43].”
From Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“This research model is a collaborative approach that engages interest-holders, including patients and public contributors, as equal partners throughout the research process [40].”
From Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?
Oliver, K., Kothari, A., & Mays, N. (2019) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3 · Cited by 754
Self-citationGrindell, C., Coates, E., Croot, L., & O’Cathain, A. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y · Cited by 409
Prehabilitation in adult patients undergoing surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
McIsaac, D. I., Gill, M., Boland, L., Hutton, B., Branje, K., Shaw, J., Grudzinski, A. L., Barone, N., Gillis, C., Akhtar, S., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.014 · Cited by 312
for the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network, Boland, L., Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., & Graham, I. D. (2020) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0521-3 · Cited by 106
Self-citationChu, C. H., Biss, R. K., Cooper, L., Quan, A. M. L., & Matulis, H. (2021) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/22370 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., & Graham, I. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Health Policy and Management
- Publisher
- Maad Rayan Publishing Company
- Published
- 2017-02-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 299-300
- ISSN
- 2322-5939
- PMC
- PMC5417154
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15
- The paper
- Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15
