The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Operator Functional State Classification Using Multiple Psychophysiological Features in an Air Traffic Control Task
Abstract
We studied 2 classifiers to determine their ability to discriminate among 4 levels of mental workload during a simulated air traffic control task using psychophysiological measures. Data from 7 air traffic controllers were used to train and test artificial neural network and stepwise discriminant classifiers. Very high levels of classification accuracy were achieved by both classifiers. When the 2 task difficulty manipulations were tested separately, the percentage correct classifications were between 84% and 88%. Feature reduction using saliency analysis for the artificial neural networks resulted in a mean of 90% correct classification accuracy. Considering the data as a 2-class problem, acceptable load versus overload, resulted in almost perfect classification accuracies, with mean percentage correct of 98%. In applied situations, the most important distinction among operator functional states would be to detect mental overload situations. These results suggest that psychophysiological data are capable of such discriminations with high levels of accuracy. Potential applications of this research include test and evaluation of new and modified systems and adaptive aiding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Psychophysiology and adaptive automation
Byrne, E. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1996) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05161-9 · Cited by 360 · cited 1×
“In some circumstances it may be possible for the system to adapt the task to meet the momentary needs of the operator (Byrne & Parasuraman, 1996).”
Background
Cited by
Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment
Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P. A., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, K., Willems, B., & Onaral, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.023 · Cited by 650
Fundamentals of physiological computing
Fairclough, S. H. (2009) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.011 · Cited by 608
Human–Agent Teaming for Multirobot Control: A Review of Human Factors Issues
Chen, J. Y. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2013.2293535 · Cited by 522
Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task
Brouwer, A.-M., Hogervorst, M. A., van Erp, J. B. F., Heffelaar, T., Zimmerman, P. H., & Oostenveld, R. (2012) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/045008 · Cited by 407
Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A. (2003) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.4.635.27088 · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 381-389
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2134818196
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operator Functional State Classification Using Multiple Psychophysiological Features in an Air Traffic Control Task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1518/hfes.45.3.381.27252
- The paper
- Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A. (2003). Operator Functional State Classification Using Multiple Psychophysiological Features in an Air Traffic Control Task. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.381.27252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.