The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Assessment of Mental Workload Using Psychophysiological Measures and Artificial Neural Networks
Abstract
The functional state of the human operator is critical to optimal system performance. Degraded states of operator functioning can lead to errors and overall suboptimal system performance. Accurate assessment of operator functional state is crucial to the successful implementation of an adaptive aiding system. One method of determining operators' functional state is by monitoring their physiology. In the present study, artificial neural networks using physiological signals were used to continuously monitor, in real time, the functional state of 7 participants while they performed the Multi-Attribute Task Battery with two levels of task difficulty. Six channels of brain electrical activity and eye, heart and respiration measures were evaluated on line. The accuracy of the classifier was determined to test its utility as an on-line measure of operator state. The mean classification accuracies were 85%, 82%, and 86% for the baseline, low task difficulty, and high task difficulty conditions, respectively. The high levels of accuracy suggest that these procedures can be used to provide accurate estimates of operator functional state that can be used to provide adaptive aiding. The relative contribution of each of the 43 psychophysiological features was also determined. Actual or potential applications of this research include test and evaluation and adaptive aiding implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
(2011) · Wilderness & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2010.11.006 · Cited by 1,188
Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task
Pope, A. T., Bogart, E. H., & Bartolome, D. S. (1995) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05116-3 · Cited by 663
Aviation, space and environmental medicine
(1990) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(90)90650-o · Cited by 625
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks
(2009) · ASME Press eBooks · doi:10.1115/1.802953 · Cited by 610
(1992) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90300-k · Cited by 571
Neurometrics: Computer-Assisted Differential Diagnosis of Brain Dysfunctions
John, E. R., Prichep, L. S., Fridman, J., & Easton, P. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3336779 · Cited by 552
Monitoring Working Memory Load during Computer-Based Tasks with EEG Pattern Recognition Methods
Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., Leong, H., McEvoy, L., Whitfield, S., Du, R., & Rush, G. (1998) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872098779480578 · Cited by 535
Psychophysiology and adaptive automation
Byrne, E. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1996) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05161-9 · Cited by 360
(2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003069447 · Cited by 332
Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications
(2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315137957 · Cited by 307
Cited by
Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation
Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x312198 · Cited by 401
An empirical study of machine learning techniques for affect recognition in human–robot interaction
Rani, P., Liu, C., Sarkar, N., & Vanman, E. (2006) · Pattern Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10044-006-0025-y · Cited by 313
A Systematic Review of Physiological Measures of Mental Workload
Tao, D., Tan, H., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Qu, X., & Zhang, T. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16152716 · Cited by 303
de Visser, E., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343411410160 · Cited by 207
Using task-induced pupil diameter and blink rate to infer cognitive load.
Chen, S., & Epps, J. (2014) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2014.892428 · Cited by 200
“…as (i) using dual tasks or multiple tasks involving different resources that cannot be easily shared simultaneously (e.g. Cinaz et al., 2010; Wilson & Russell, 2003; Veltman & Gaillard, 1998; Marshall, 2007), (ii) increasing the number of events needing to be handled at the same time, e.g.…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635-644
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2056294943
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-Time Assessment of Mental Workload Using Psychophysiological Measures and Artificial Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1518/hfes.45.4.635.27088
- The paper
- Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A. (2003). Real-Time Assessment of Mental Workload Using Psychophysiological Measures and Artificial Neural Networks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.4.635.27088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.