Cited by 62Probiotics and Fermented FoodsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Effects of Probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) Supplementation During Offseason Resistance Training in Female Division I Athletes

Toohey, Jeremy C., Townsend, Jeremy R., Johnson, Sean B., Toy, Ann M., Vantrease, William C., Bender, David, Crimi, Chelsea C., Stowers, Kathryn L. +4 more·2020·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

Toohey, JC, Townsend, JR, Johnson, SB, Toy, AM, Vantrease, WC, Bender, D, Crimi, CC, Stowers, KL, Ruiz, MD, VanDusseldorp, TA, Feito, Y, and Mangine, GT. Effects of probiotic ( Bacillus subtilis ) supplementation during offseason resistance training in female Division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res 34(11): 3173–3181, 2020–We examined the effects of probiotic ( Bacillus subtilis ) supplementation during offseason training in collegiate athletes. Twenty-three Division I female athletes (19.6 ± 1.0 years, 67.5 ± 7.4 kg, and 170.6 ± 6.8 cm) participated in this study and were randomized into either a probiotic ( n = 11; DE111) or placebo ( n = 12; PL) group while counterbalancing groups for sport. Athletes completed a 10-week resistance training program during the offseason, which consisted of 3–4 workouts per week of upper- and lower-body exercises and sport-specific training. Athletes consumed DE111 (DE111; 5 billion CFU/day) or PL supplement daily for the entire 10-week program. Before and after training, all athletes underwent 1 repetition maximum (1RM) strength testing (squat, deadlift, and bench press), performance testing (vertical jump and pro-agility), and isometric midthigh pull testing. Body composition (body fat [BF]%) was completed using BODPOD and bioelectrical impedance analysis, as well as muscle thickness (MT) measurement of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis using ultrasonography. Separate repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to analyze all data. Significant ( p ≤ 0.05) main effects for time were observed for improved squat 1RM, deadlift 1RM, bench press 1RM, vertical jump, RF MT, and BF%. Of these, a significant group × time interaction was noted for BF% ( p = 0.015), where greater reductions were observed in DE111 (−2.05 ± 1.38%) compared with PL (−0.2 ± 1.6%). No other group differences were observed. These data suggest that probiotic consumption in conjunction with post-workout nutrition had no effect on physical performance but may improve body composition in female Division I soccer and volleyball players after offseason training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002675

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Division I female volleyball and soccer athletes, 10 weeks of B. subtilis DE111 probiotic supplementation with a post-workout recovery drink yielded greater reductions in body fat and increases in fat free mass than placebo.

    “Probiotic supplementation with the post-workout recovery drink yielded greater reductions in body fat and increases in fat free mass after 10 weeks of resistance training than a placebo.”
  • Probiotic supplementation, both with and without resistance training, can decrease body weight and fat mass in overweight and obese individuals, as well as female athletes.

    “Probiotic supplementation, both with and without resistance training, can decrease levels of body weight and fat mass in overweight and obese individuals, as well as female athletes [103, 241, 242].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 62

Authors
Toohey, J. C., Townsend, J. R., Johnson, S. B., Toy, A. M., Vantrease, W. C., Bender, D., Crimi, C. C., Stowers, K. L., Ruiz, M. D., VanDusseldorp, T. A., Feito, Y., & Mangine, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Lipscomb University (US)
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
Corresponding author
Townsend, Jeremy R.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2020-11
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
3173-3181
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810059611
Cited by
62
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
probiotics, Bacillus subtilis, resistance training, female athletes, collegiate athletes, off-season training, muscle strength, vertical jump, agility, body composition, body fat percentage, muscle thickness, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, gut microbiota, dietary supplementation, muscle hypertrophy, fat-free mass, lean body mass
MeSH terms
Bacillus subtilis, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Soccer, Ultrasonography, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics, Muscle Strength, Volleyball, Resistance Training, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review