The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reaction Time in the Agility Test Under Simulated Competitive and Noncompetitive Conditions
Abstract
The study evaluates a reaction time in the Agility Test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions. A group of 16 fit men performed, in random order, 2 versions of the Agility Test: non-competitive Agility Single and Agility Dual in form of simulated competition. In both cases, subjects had to touch, as fast as possible, with either the left or the right foot 1 of 4 mats located in 4 corners outside of an 80 cm square. Mats had to be touched in accordance with the location of the stimulus in one of the corners of the screen. The test consisted of 20 visual stimuli with random generation of their location on the screen and time generation from 500 to 2,500 milliseconds. The result was total reaction time (RT) for all 20 reactions measured by a PC-based system FiTRO Agility Check. Results showed significantly (p < 0.01) better RT in the Agility Dual than in the Agility Single Test (690.6 ± 83.8 milliseconds and 805.8 ± 101.1 milliseconds, respectively). Further comparisons of RT under noncompetitive and simulated competitive conditions for the best 8 subjects proceeded in the second match showed a decrease from 781.3 ± 111.2 milliseconds to 693.6 ± 97.8 milliseconds in the first match and to 637.0 ± 53.0 milliseconds in the second match. It may be concluded that RT is better when the Agility Test is performed in simulated competitive than noncompetitive conditions. The Agility Test in form of competition may be used for children and young athletes to enhance their attention level and motivation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The present study extends literature that ties agility and reaction time to perceptual–cognitive factors and sport-specific stimuli [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,15,68] by showing that a brief, structured psychological intervention can enhance these motor outcomes alongside mental-health indicators.”
From Effects of the SmartACT Intervention on Motor and Psychological Variables in Adolescent Athletes: A Controlled Trial Using BlazePod and Microgate. (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing
Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410500457109 · Cited by 1,707
Sheppard, J. M., Young, W. B., Doyle, T. L. A., Sheppard, T. A., & Newton, R. U. (2006) · Journal of science and medicine in sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019 · Cited by 362
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sport-Specific Assessment of the Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Training in Young Athletes
Zemková, E., & Hamar, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00264 · Cited by 69
“In such a case, agility time is significantly shorter when the test is performed by two subjects simultaneously (Agility Dual) than by one subject (Agility Single) (Zemková et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMarques, J. B., Read, P. J., Graham-Smith, P., & Read, P. J. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01189-4 · Cited by 46
Aerobic-Strength Exercise Improves Metabolism and Clinical State in Parkinson’s Disease Patients
Krumpolec, P., Vallova, S., Slobodová, L., Tirpáková, V., Vajda, M., Schön, M., Klepochová, R., Janakova, Z., Straka, I., Šutovský, S., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00698 · Cited by 49
“Maximal isometric force and the rate of force development (RFD) were determined on a linear legpress in a semi-squat position (22); and maximum isometric torque of knee extensors and flexors was assessed with a knee dynamometer (S2P-Ltd.”
MethodAgility performance in athletes of different sport specializations
Zemková, E., & Hamar, D. (2014) · Acta Gymnica · doi:10.5507/ag.2014.013 · Cited by 36
Kovačíková, Z., & Zemková, E. (2020) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2020.1724862 · Cited by 29
“Competitive environment has a high potential for sports training and also testing, as it increases the attention level and motivation, which may translate to better performance compared to exercising on one’s own (Tauer & Harackiewicz, 2004; Zemková et al., 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Zemková, E., Vilman, T., Kováčiková, Z., & Hamar, D.
- Affiliations
- Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
- Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
- Corresponding author
- Zemková, Erika
- ORCID
- Zemková, Erika
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3445-3449
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063102377
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Slovenská Akadémia Vied
- Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
- Keywords
- reaction time, agility test, simulated competition, competitive environment, attention, motivation, youth athletes, children
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Competitive Behavior, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Athletic Performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review