Cited by 26Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and EducationSports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

A Review of Striking Force in Full-Contact Combat Sport Athletes: Methods of Assessment

Open access
Lenetsky, Seth, Uthoff, Aaron, Coyne, Joseph, Cronin, John·2022·Strength & Conditioning Journal

Abstract

With striking force playing such a critical role in the success of full-contact combat sports such as mixed martial arts, taekwondo, and boxing, coaches and scientists must be able to track this performance metric accurately and reliably. This review will cover practitioner understanding of key kinetic variables used in the assessment of striking important concepts relating to the validity, reliability, and reporting of meaningful performance changes in the assessment process, a critique of the methods used to monitor changes in striking forces, and provide practical recommendations for practitioners in the field. This understanding will help coaches and scientists assess and interpret the effectiveness of training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000643

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct comparison of punch impact force between measurement devices is not recommended.

    “Due to these varying factors, and their differing validity and reliability, the direct comparison of punch impact force between measurement devices is not recommended (25).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Practitioners should select a measurement device based on ecological validity, reliability, and smallest worthwhile change.

    “Nonetheless, it is recommened that practitioners who aim to assess punch impact force should select the measurement device based on ecological validity, reliability, and smallest worthwhile change (SWC) (25).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

  • The authors say direct comparison of punch impact force between measurement devices is not recommended because of their differing validity and reliability.

    “Due to these varying factors, and their differing validity and reliability, the direct comparison of punch impact force between measurement devices is not recommended (25).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Practitioners should select punch-impact measurement devices based on ecological validity, reliability, and smallest worthwhile change.

    “Nonetheless, it is recommened that practitioners who aim to assess punch impact force should select the measurement device based on ecological validity, reliability, and smallest worthwhile change (SWC) (25).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Because boxing lacks a gold-standard punch assessment, a wide variety of devices and protocols have been used.

    “However, at present, there is no 'gold' standard for assessing punch performance in boxers. Due to this, a wide variety of assessment devices and protocols have been utilised”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenetsky, S., Uthoff, A., Coyne, J., & Cronin, J.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Uthoff, Aaron
Venue
Strength & Conditioning Journal
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
71-83
ISSN
  • 1073-6840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-1602
OpenAlex
W3157524757
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Strength and conditioning journal (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
mixed martial arts, taekwondo, boxing, performance evaluation, kinetic variables, reliability and validity, training monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review