Cited by 36Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and EducationSports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

A damaging punch: Assessment and application of a method to quantify punch performance

Open access
Dunn, Emily C., Humberstone, Clare E., Iredale, K. Fiona, Blazevich, Anthony J.·2019·Translational Sports Medicine

Abstract

Measurement of punch performance in a reliable, quantitative manner is relevant to combat sport, military, and concussion research. A punching protocol (3MPT) was developed, based on performance demands of amateur boxing, and evaluated on a custom-built punch integrator (PI). PI reliability and accuracy were assessed by calculating TE and CV for a range of known masses. A within-subject, repeated-measures design assessed the test-retest reliability of 3MPT. Fifteen male boxers (17.5 ± 0.5 years; 177.5 ± 9.5 cm; 73.0 ± 14.0 kg) were familiarized and then completed two 3MPT trials 90 minutes apart on 2 days (total of four tests). Peak punch force (N), relative punch force (N/kg), impulse (N·s), and rate of force development calculated to various time points were compared using a linear mixed model. Smallest worthwhile change (SWC) was also computed. PI data were reliable and accurate (CV <0.1%). TE and SWC comparisons revealed that 3MPT can detect moderate and large changes in performance; however, within-day reliability improved from day 1 (3.1%-13.8%) to 2 (2.3%-5.1%) indicating a possible learning effect. Likewise, differences between test one and two were greater on day 1 than 2. Numerous punch-related variables can be accurately and reliably measured using the 3MPT but repeat-trial familiarization is suggested to reduce between-test variability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tsm2.71

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A hook produces higher impact forces than straight punches.

    “Due to this unique movement, a hook produces higher impact forces than straight punches (6,11,13).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

  • The ability to punch with a high impact force is beneficial to boxers because it increases the likelihood of success (e.g., influencing judges' perception, impairing the opponent, knock down or knock out).

    “The ability to punch with a high impact force is beneficial to boxers as there is an increased likelihood of success.”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

  • The importance of the cardiovascular system (i.e. VO2max) for elite boxing has been well established in the literature.

    “The importance of the cardiovascular system (i.e. VO2max) for elite boxing has been well established in the literature (13, 18, 44).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Protocol design section describes elite boxers’ work rates, and the Human performance trials section mentions aerobic activity only as part of a warm-up. Neither addresses the importance of cardiovascular fitness or VO2max for elite boxing (searched: VO2max, aerobic capacity, maximal oxygen uptake). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]8. Parkinson D, Jell RM. Concussion. Surg Neurol. 1988;30(2):102-107.
  2. [22]22. Dyson R, Smith M, Fenn L, Martin C. Differences in lead and rear hand punching forces, delivered at maximal speed relative to max- imal force, by amateur boxers. 23rd International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; August 22-27, 2005; Bejing, China.
  3. [24]24. Dyson R, Smith M, Martin C, Fenn L. Muscular recruitment during rear hand punches delivered at maximal force and speed by amateur boxers. 25th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; August 23-27, 2007; Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, E. C., Humberstone, C. E., Iredale, K. F., & Blazevich, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Australian Institute of Sport Bruce Australian Capital Territory Australia
  • Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Science Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia
Corresponding author
Dunn, Emily C.
Venue
Translational Sports Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-21
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
146-152
ISSN
2573-8488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911656534
Cited by
36
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
impulse, rate of force development, test-retest reliability, smallest worthwhile change, boxing, concussion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review