The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Operational Criteria for the Determination of Suicide
Abstract
Suicide is an important public health problem for which we have an inadequate public health database. In the United States, decisions about whether deaths are listed as suicides on death certificates are usually made by a coroner or medical examiner. These certification decisions are frequently marked by a lack of consistency and clarity, and laws and procedures for guiding these decisions vary from state to state and even from county to county. Without explicit criteria to aid in this decision making, coroners or medical examiners may be more susceptible to pressures from families or communities not to certify specific deaths as suicide. In addition, coroners or medical examiners may certify similar deaths differently at different times. The degree to which suicides may be underreported or misclassified is unknown. This makes it impossible to estimate accurately the number of deaths by suicide, to identify risk factors, or to plan and evaluate preventive interventions. To remedy these problems, a working group representing coroners, medical examiners, statisticians, and public health agencies developed operational criteria to assist in the determination of suicide. These criteria are based on a definition of suicide as “death arising from an act inflicted upon oneself with the intent to kill oneself.” The purpose of these criteria is to improve the validity and reliability of suicide statistics by: (1) promoting consistent and uniform classifications; (2) making the criteria for decision making in death certification explicit; (3) increasing the amount of information used in decision making; (4) aiding certifiers in exercising their professional judgment; and (5) establishing common standards of practice for the determination of suicide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The coal gas story. United Kingdom suicide rates, 1960-71.
Kreitman, N. (1976) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.30.2.86 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Silverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'Carroll, P. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.264 · Cited by 991
Self-citationBeyond the tower of Babel: A nomenclature for suicidology
O'Carroll, P. W., Berman, A. L., Maris, R. W., Moscicki, E. K., Tanney, B. L., & Silverman, M. M. (1996) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.1996.tb00609.x · Cited by 982
Self-citationSilverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'Carroll, P. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.248 · Cited by 593
Self-citationA systematic review and meta-analysis of premature mortality in bipolar affective disorder
Hayes, J. F., Miles, J., Walters, K., King, M., & Osborn, D. P. J. (2015) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12408 · Cited by 370
Epidemiology of completed and attempted suicide: toward a framework for prevention
Mościcki, E. K. (2001) · Clinical Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/s1566-2772(01)00032-9 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenberg, M., Davidson, L., Smith, J., Berman, A., Buzbee, H., Gantner, G., Gay, G., Moore-Lewis, B., Mills, D., Murray, D., O'Carroll, P., & Jobes, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1445-1456
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1531701293
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operational Criteria for the Determination of Suicide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs12589j
- The paper
- Rosenberg, M., Davidson, L., Smith, J., Berman, A., Buzbee, H., Gantner, G., Gay, G., Moore-Lewis, B., Mills, D., Murray, D., O'Carroll, P., & Jobes, D. (1988). Operational Criteria for the Determination of Suicide. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs12589j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.