Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of a 16-Locus Fluorescent Multiplex System

Krenke, BE, Tereba, A, Anderson, SJ, Buel, E, Culhane, S, Finis, CJ, Tomsey, CS, Zachetti, JM, Masibay, A, Rabbach, DR, Amiott, EA, Sprecher, CJ·2002·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

STR multiplexes have been indispensable for the efficient genotyping of forensic samples. The PowerPlex® 16 System contains the core CODIS loci, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D21S11, CSF1PO, FGA, TH01, TPOX, vWA, the sex determinant locus, amelogenin, and two pentanucleotide STR loci, Penta D and Penta E. This multiplex satisfies the locus requirements for most national databases and is the most efficient currently available system due to its single PCR amplification. To provide the groundwork for judicial acceptance, including the publication of primer sequences, and to evaluate laboratory-to-laboratory variation, a developmental validation for casework on this commercially available system was performed in 24 laboratories and produced the following conclusions. Amplification was reliable on a variety of thermal cyclers and product could be analyzed on either an ABI PRISM® 310 Genetic Analyzer or an ABI PRISM® 377 DNA Sequencer. Genotyping using single source samples was consistent between 0.25 and 2 ng of input DNA template with a few laboratories obtaining complete genotypes at 0.0625 ng. However, heterozygote allele imbalance (_60% peak height balance) caused by stochastic effects was observed at a rate of 13% with 0.125 ng DNA and 22% at 0.0625 ng DNA. Mixture analyses were done using a total of 1 ng of DNA template. Most alleles were detected in mixtures of 4 to 1 and some minor alleles were detected in mixtures of 19 to 1. Optimum amplification cycle number was dependent on the sensitivity of the detection instrument used and could also be adjusted to accommodate larger amounts of DNA on solid supports such as FTA® paper. Reaction conditions including volume, annealing temperature, and concentrations of primer, AmpliTaq Gold®, and magnesium were shown to be optimal yet robust enough to withstand moderate variations without affecting genotype analysis. Environmental, matrix and standard source analyses revealed an ability to obtain complete genotypes in all sample types except those exposed to 80°C for 12–48 days. Finally, comparison of genotype results from the PowerPlex® 16 System with other commercially available systems on non-probative reference and forensic samples showed consistent results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1520/jfs15445j

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Krenke, B., Tereba, A., Anderson, S., Buel, E., Culhane, S., Finis, C., Tomsey, C., Zachetti, J., Masibay, A., Rabbach, D., Amiott, E., & Sprecher, C.
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150858326
Cited by
301
References
1
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a 16-Locus Fluorescent Multiplex System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs15445j
The paper
Krenke, B., Tereba, A., Anderson, S., Buel, E., Culhane, S., Finis, C., Tomsey, C., Zachetti, J., Masibay, A., Rabbach, D., Amiott, E., & Sprecher, C. (2002). Validation of a 16-Locus Fluorescent Multiplex System. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15445j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.