The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining the Sex of Human Remains Through Cranial Morphology
Abstract
Sex determination is the keystone of a biological profile, yet few qualitative methods of cranial sex determination have been tested. This analysis examines the accuracy and precision of 17 morphological features of the skull commonly used to determine the sex of unknown skeletal remains. The sample consists of 46 identified skulls from the 19th century St. Thomas' Anglican Church Cemetery in Belleville, Canada. Nasal aperature, zygomatic extension, malar size/rugosity, and supraorbital ridge proved the most useful; of secondary value are chin form and nuchal crest; mastoid size is of tertiary consideration; nasal size and mandibular symphysis/ramus size rank fourth; forehead shape ranks fifth; and palate size/shape are sixth. Skull size/architecture provides an internal standard to assess the relative sizes of other traits. This research is a necessary step in establishing the credibility of morphological sex determination with respect to the Daubert and Mohan criteria for admissibility in a court of law.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,903
The human skeleton in forensic medicine
J.A.S. (1963) · American Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1 · Cited by 1,645
Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual
Bass, W. M. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,061
Reconstruction of life from the skeleton
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5824 · Cited by 1,022
The Analysis of prehistoric diets
Gilbert, R. I., & Mielke, J. H. (1985) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 469
Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania
Giles, E., & Elliot, O. (1963) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210108 · Cited by 449
The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms
Nanda, R. S. (1955) · American Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1016/0002-9416(55)90112-3 · Cited by 297
Accuracy and direction of error in the sexing of the skeleton: Implications for paleodemography
Meindl, R. S., Lovejoy, C. O., Mensforth, R. P., & Carlos, L. D. (1985) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680108 · Cited by 257
Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton
Humphrey, L. T. (1998) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::aid-ajpa6>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 255
Forensic Anthropology Training Manual
Burns, K. R. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315664163 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Ferrell, M. J., Schultz, J. J., & Adams, D. M. (2024) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.15522 · Cited by 13
Battan, S. K., Sharma, M., Garg, M., Singh, P., Sharma, S., & Verma, P. (2026) · Journal of the Anatomical Society of India · doi:10.4103/jasi.jasi_48_26
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026966095
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 46.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining the Sex of Human Remains Through Cranial Morphology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs2003385
- The paper
- Rogers, T. (2005). Determining the Sex of Human Remains Through Cranial Morphology. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2003385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.